Minutes
<Sanjay>
Dave, are you dialed in?
Resolution: 2008-07-31 minutes located at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/200808/msg00001.html approved.
AI #0021 : lot of work done but RIDL document is not uploaded
<Michael Rowley>
Just joined. I hadn't seen the updated conf #.
Martin Chapman:
Spec version 9 contains section 2.1.1 in RFC2119, but it is not approved by committee.
Michael Rowley:
Section 2.1 needs to be reverted for CD01 version 9.
Martin to revert RFC2119 changes to section 2.1 for CD01 version 9.
Sanjay:
main issue was to define conformance target
Danny:
Send this issue to liaison committee as this is generic problem
to define appropriate conformance targets
Sanjay:
First we should provide a concrete proposal then send it to the liaison committee
Mike Edwards:
We should first define what introspected component type will be.
Danny:
What introspected component type file will be is already well defined. The conformance target for generated component type
file is in contention.
Sanjay:
Define terminology for component type file.
Michael Rowley:
any member who objected to language in section 2.1 can re-write section in a way that is acceptable to the committee.
Martin Chapman will update section 2.1
Sanjay:
CD revision 05 and revision 09 has last two proposals for this issue.
Sanjay:
we first come up with proposal then take the amorphous terminology to the liaison committee.
Michael Rowley:
Assembly spec should define following terms: Component type file, introspected component type and component type information.
<Michael Rowley>
The last one was: "effective component type"
Action item for Martin Chapman to come up with the revised proposal and then
submit it to the assembly committee for action.
Comeback to this TC with revised proposal and after it is approved by this TC.
then submit it to the assembly TC.
Action: Martin Chapman to make proposal for issue 18
Sanjay:
Can we apply RFC2119 changes in parallel?
<Mike Edwards>
Martin - you might like to look at:
Martin Chapman:
we can as some sections have conformance targets that are not in dispute.
<Mike Edwards>
sca-javaci-draft-20070926_IssueXX.doc
<Mike Edwards>
from the Java TC
Schreiber diagnostics output
[Delete this section before publishing the minutes]
citation-detection-scribed: Line 64: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'AI #0021 '
statistics: Schreiber found 79 input lines
edits: Schreiber found no text-edit commands
command-scribe: Line 1: Najeeb Andrabi recognized
command-scribe: Schreiber detected that this section was scribed online
citation-detection-irc1: Line 21: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'
citation-detection-irc1: Line 29: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'
citation-detection-irc1: Line 32: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'
citation-detection-irc1: Line 43: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'
citation-detection-irc1: Line 45: Check for possible unrecognized nick '7. Issue 18 http'
citation-detection-irc1: Line 49: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'
citation-detection-irc1: Line 50: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'
citation-detection-irc1: Line 51: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'
citation-detection-irc1: Line 52: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'
system: Transformer: SAXON 9.0.0.2
[End of Schreiber diagnostic output]