[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [search-ws] document for July 18 meeting
Yes I agree with all that. My thought was to walk through a strawman document for the purpose of getting a clearer idea of what sort of starting document we want to aim for. --Ray ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew J. Dovey" <m.dovey@jisc.ac.uk> To: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>; <search-ws@lists.oasis-open.org> Cc: <tc-admin@lists.oasis-open.org>; "Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 2:14 PM Subject: RE: [search-ws] document for July 18 meeting To be honest, I think that the first meeting will be primarily procedural. In particular, OASIS procedures, TC procedures (we need to confirm decisions about IPR, process as regards committee drafts and other working practices). I suspect that will take up the best part of an hour. It would be worth giving an overview of SRU and CQL, its origins and the principles behind context sets and profiles but not delve into the technical details at the first meeting. This would set the background for the objectives and scope of the TC. Matthew > -----Original Message----- > From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress [mailto:rden@loc.gov] > Sent: 06 July 2007 18:22 > To: search-ws@lists.oasis-open.org > Cc: tc-admin@lists.oasis-open.org; Mary McRae > Subject: [search-ws] document for July 18 meeting > > For the conference call July 18, I'm not sure of the agenda but as it > is > scheduled for two-hours, I assume it is more than just administrative > issues > and that we may spend some time discussing technical matters. > > So I would like to make available a discussion document. Can someone > briefly > advise the best way to do that? I'm just geting started trying to > figure > these things out. I could put it up here (at LC) and send a link, or > should > I use the OASIS facilities and download it? (Having a bit of trouble > figuring out how to do that.) > > I have started putting together in single-document form the SRU spec > and if > appropriate it might be useful to walk through it during the call. > Currently it is 65-page pdf file (still working on it). I could have > it > available sometime next week, mid-week or earlier. Someone please > advise. > > Thanks. --Ray > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]