OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
security-bindings
27 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
Elist Home
Match ALL words
Match ANY word
Agenda for con-call
From
"Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com> on Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:03:23 -0400 (EDT)
Re: Subject: PartnerID revisited
From
RL 'Bob' Morgan <rlmorgan@washington.edu> on Thu, 27 Sep 2001 04:43:02 -0400 (EDT)
FW: InterCall Confirmation of Conference Call Reservation 1959601
From
"Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com> on Wed, 26 Sep 2001 21:54:01 -0400 (EDT)
RE: Subject: PartnerID revisited
From
"Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com> on Wed, 26 Sep 2001 21:50:12 -0400 (EDT)
RE: Subject: PartnerID revisited
From
George Robert Blakley III <blakley@us.tivoli.com> on Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:56:16 -0400 (EDT)
RE: Subject: PartnerID revisited
From
Simon Godik <sgodik@crosslogix.com> on Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:06:06 -0400 (EDT)
Minutes from Bindings con-call, Sep 20
From
"Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com> on Wed, 26 Sep 2001 12:44:18 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: PartnerID revisited
From
"Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com> on Tue, 25 Sep 2001 23:01:13 -0400 (EDT)
Relying party tailors assertion in browser artifact profile
From
Tim Moses <tim.moses@entrust.com> on Fri, 21 Sep 2001 17:05:37 -0400 (EDT)
Re: PartnerID format
From
christopher ferris <chris.ferris@Sun.COM> on Thu,20 Sep 2001 14:02:57 -0400 (EDT)
Difficulty joining the call..
From
"Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com> on Thu, 20 Sep 2001 12:10:11 -0400 (EDT)
RE: PartnerID format
From
"Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com> on Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:07:12 -0400 (EDT)
RE: PartnerID format
From
Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu> on Thu,20 Sep 2001 10:27:19 -0400 (EDT)
Con-Call Agenda
From
"Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com> on Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:21:13 -0400 (EDT)
FW: PartnerID format
From
"Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com> on Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:11:19 -0400 (EDT)
FW: InterCall Confirmation of Conference Call Reservation 1896166
From
"Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com> on Wed, 19 Sep 2001 22:45:32 -0400 (EDT)
No Con-call tomorrow
From
"Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com> on Wed, 12 Sep 2001 19:16:45 -0400 (EDT)
RE: PartnerID format
From
Tim Moses <tim.moses@entrust.com> on Wed, 12 Sep 2001 15:05:06 -0400 (EDT)
PartnerID format
From
"Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com> on Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:45:55 -0400 (EDT)
RE: Is an authentication assertion mandatory in SAML?
From
Marlena Erdos <marlena@us.ibm.com> on Wed,05 Sep 2001 00:53:32 -0400 (EDT)
Oasis Bindings Con-Call on September 6, 12 noon
From
"Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com> on Tue, 04 Sep 2001 19:00:10 -0400 (EDT)
RE: Is an authentication assertion mandatory in SAML?
From
George Robert Blakley III <blakley@us.tivoli.com> on Tue, 04 Sep 2001 15:07:46 -0400 (EDT)
RE: Is an authentication assertion mandatory in SAML?
From
"Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com> on Tue, 04 Sep 2001 15:00:40 -0400 (EDT)
RE: Is an authentication assertion mandatory in SAML?
From
George Robert Blakley III <blakley@us.tivoli.com> on Tue, 04 Sep 2001 14:48:13 -0400 (EDT)
RE: Is an authentication assertion mandatory in SAML?
From
"Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com> on Tue, 04 Sep 2001 14:16:53 -0400 (EDT)
RE: Is an authentication assertion mandatory in SAML?
From
Hal Lockhart <hal.lockhart@entegrity.com> on Tue, 04 Sep 2001 13:24:27 -0400 (EDT)
Re: Is an authentication assertion mandatory in SAML?
From
Marlena Erdos <marlena@us.ibm.com> on Tue,04 Sep 2001 11:37:17 -0400 (EDT)
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.2