[security-jc] Re: Concerns about SJC Charter -- Re: [rights] SecurityJC Charter

[Phil Griffin <phil.griffin@asn-1.com>]

Thanks for these comments Thomas, Hari. These sorts
of concerns speak to me, as just a couple of days ago
it was suggested to me on an IETF list that the basis
for the XCBF TC work had no place in the "WS Community".
I believe that the thrust of the SJC and certainly
OASIS in general is to be inclusive rather than not.

I've got "6. Voting results on proposed SJC charter"
on the agenda for the call tomorrow. But as my own
personal response, keep in mind that the SJC has no
control or authority over any TC, or for that matter
no control over what TCs OASIS may approve. Each TC
that joins the SJC gets one vote. There are probably
going to be overlaps due to common interests.

Hari, I hope that you can attend the meeting tomorrow.
And remember that others appointed by your TC liaison
SC are also welcome to participate. Note that two people
from XCBF attend.

Phil



Thomas Hardjono wrote:

> 
> Hari,
> 
> I some concern about the SJC charter, in particular the point about
> a Reference Model.
> 
>         To champion the creation of a reference model that shows how
>         OASIS security TC specifications are inter-related.
>         This reference model shall define how OASIS security related
>         specifications "fit together" and relate to other security
>         relevant works at W3C, IETF, WS-I, X.509 etc.
> 
> 
> My questions:
> -------------
> 
> 1. Who will develop this Reference Model?
> 
> 2. Will all members of all security-related TCs have a vote
>    to approve/reject the Reference Model?
> 
> 3. Is the Reference Model a technical architecture or is it a tool
>    to organize TCs and the work carried-out among hem.
> 
> 4. Will the Reference Model be used to accept/deny new
>    security-related TCs being established in Oasis?
> 
> 5. Will there be equal participation of all chairs of TCs in the SJC.
>    (nb. I noticed both chairs of XACML are on the SJC).
> 
> 6. Will the SJC have any say in the future creation of any new
>    security-related TC or other TCs in general?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Thomas
> ------
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> Thomas Hardjono
> Principal Scientist
> VeriSign
> 401 Edgewater Place, Suite 280
> Wakefield, MA 01880
> Tel: 781-245-6996x231
> Fax: 781-245-6006
> Email: thardjono@verisign.com
> ------------------------------
> 
> 
> At 9/17/2002||06:24 PM, Reddy, Hari wrote:
> 
>> Hello Everyone:
>> I would like to get comments on the following Security JC Charter and 
>> process them during the General Body call on 09-18-02. I have reviewed 
>> the Charter and would recommend its approval by the RLTC. I have not 
>> sent the vote in because I wanted the RLTC membership to have an 
>> opportunity to discuss it, if necessary. If you have any questions, 
>> please feel free to contact me.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hari
>>
>> The Security JC Charter as published in [1] and amended in [2]:
>>
>> > [1]
>> > 
>> <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-jc/200208/msg00020.html>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-jc/200208/msg00020.html 
>>
>> > [2]
>> > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-jc/200208/msg00023.html
>> >
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> Thomas Hardjono
> Principal Scientist
> VeriSign
> 401 Edgewater Place, Suite 280
> Wakefield, MA 01880
> Tel: 781-245-6996x231
> Fax: 781-245-6006
> Email: thardjono@verisign.com
> ------------------------------
> 
>