[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [tag] Meeting schedules: some PROPOSAL
Yes, sure. I've noted this. Patrick Curran wrote: > I think you're off by an hour in your calculations of Russian time. > According to the World Clock <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/> > (which I've now linked from our Wiki homepage): > > * 10:00 am in California is 9:00 pm in Russia > * 9:00 pm in California is 8:00 am in Russia > > Vladimir: can you confirm? > > Durand, Jacques R. wrote: >> A slight correction: >> >> In S-B, it is "Wednesday" for California time, but not for GMT time >> where it is 4am Thursday... (so that would be a Thursday 7am for Victor >> in StPeter) >> >> But so far does not seem to create any clash - Victor can also do S-A, >> technically. >> >> -Jacques >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Vladimir.Sosnin@Sun.COM [mailto:Vladimir.Sosnin@Sun.COM] >> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 8:28 AM >> To: Durand, Jacques R. >> Cc: Patrick.Curran@Sun.COM; tag@lists.oasis-open.org >> Subject: Re: [tag] Meeting schedules: some PROPOSAL >> >> Both schedules good for me. First is a bit more preferable. >> >> Vladimir >> >> Durand, Jacques R. wrote: >> >>> OK, so looking at the current availability charts, let us try to get >>> some reaction from those silent on their availability: >>> >>> It appears that *Wednesdays* might be better for both schedules. >>> >>> >>> *(S-A)* (would replace current 7am Thursday call) >>> *Wednesday*: 5pm GMT (8pm StPetersb, [2am Beijing, 3am Seoul], 10am >>> California, 1pm EastCoast, 5pm UK) (really bad for: Seoul, Beijing) >>> >>> *(S-B)* (new alternate call) >>> *Wednesday*: 4am GMT (7am StPetersb, 1pm Beijing, 2pm Seoul, 9pm >>> California, [midnight EastCoast, 4am UK,] ) (really bad for: >>> EastCoast, UK) >>> >>> >>> Comments? >>> Note: an additional requirement is that both chairs can make both >>> scehdules, in case one needs replacement. >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> -- >>> *From:* Patrick.Curran@Sun.COM [mailto:Patrick.Curran@Sun.COM] >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 30, 2007 3:57 PM >>> *To:* Durand, Jacques R. >>> *Cc:* tag@lists.oasis-open.org >>> *Subject:* Re: [tag] Meeting schedules >>> >>> Well... As I explained in the Conference Call Availability >>> <http://wiki.oasis-open.org/tag/ConcallAvailability> page on the Wiki, >>> >> >> >>> 7:00 am Pacific time on Thursdays probably will *not* work for me in >>> the future. >>> >>> However, since tomorrow is OK and since I'll be out for the next few >>> weeks, I don't suggest changing this now. >>> >>> As for the alternate week's schedule, it's difficult for me to respond >>> >> >> >>> without a more specific suggestion. I've indicated my availability - >>> 9:00 pm Pacific time (5:00 am GMT) works for me (except for Friday) >>> but 6:00 pm (3:00 am) does not. >>> >>> In general, as I've already said, I'm amenable to an alternating >>> >> schedule. >> >>> I really don't think we're going to be able to work this out unless >>> *everyone* indicates their availability in writing. We have a Wiki >>> page where we can do this (see the reference above, but so far only >>> three of us have entered our data. I encourage the others to do so. >>> >>> Durand, Jacques R. wrote: >>> >>>> COnsidering the option where : >>>> >>>> - we use alternate 1h meeting schedules: >>>> week 1: schedule A >>>> week 2: schedule B >>>> week 3: schedule A >>>> etc. >>>> - and we accept the fact that not everyone will be able to make it at >>>> >> >> >>>> every meeting, but that everyone will like at least one schedule (A >>>> or B). >>>> >>>> We could consider: >>>> >>>> - schedule A is for accommodating everyone except Asia (could remain >>>> 2pmGMT as current Thu, or be 4pm or 5pm GMT.) >>>> - schedule B is good for Asia (office hours) and for accommodating >>>> everyone except UK and East coast (5amGMT) or everyone except UK and >>>> Russia (3amGMT) >>>> >>>> Would that be acceptable, knowing that all major decisions would be >>>> taken by electronic ballot? >>>> (conference calls would be used mostly to (a) make progress toward >>>> consensus on some tech topic, (b) bring up new issues and initiate >>>> some discussion, (c) discuss logistics and administrative aspects.) >>>> >>>> -Jacques >>>> >>>> >> >> -- >> Vladimir Sosnin >> Sun Microsystems vladimir.sosnin@sun.com >> >> > -- Vladimir Sosnin Sun Microsystems vladimir.sosnin@sun.com
begin:vcard fn:Vladimir Sosnin n:Sosnin;Vladimir org:Sun Microsystems Inc.;J2SE JDMX BU322 adr:;;;St. Petersburg;;;Russia email;internet:Vladimir.Sosnin@Sun.COM title:Software Engineer tel;work:x33105 x-mozilla-html:TRUE version:2.1 end:vcard
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]