Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question

[Jan Algermissen <algermissen@acm.org>]

Hi Lars !

You said:
...
> 
> Secondly, this would imply that the type of query format somehow
> limits the validity of the name, which is not the case.
> 

That really expresses the basic problem I think: Scoping
should be used in order to express the extend of validity
a topic characteristic assignment has. So, how do you scope
if you want to express that a name is in fact a valid
characteristic in any context? The problem comes in, if ones
starts scoping *only* to avoid beeing merged.

This applies to my example also: Amazonas is a valid name
for Amazon State and it does not feel natural to say it is
only valid in the context of politics.

My question:

Does the TNC apply if topics have the same name in the same
scope
but different PSIs ? Did I miss it in the specs ?


If it does not apply, could your script generate a
<subjectIdentityRef>
to the specs of XQL and XML-QL ?

Jan

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://us.click.yahoo.com/kWP7PD/pYNCAA/4ihDAA/2n6YlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/