Re: [xtm-wg] A challenge on "the graph"

["W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@isogen.com>]

Sam Hunting wrote:
> Of course, as I see it UML is a modelling langauge for *software
> systems*. No wonder it is most useful for that. But we are not building
> such a system, so to the extent UML is optimized for its market
> realities, it may not be suitable for us.

But the processing model *defines a software system*. 
 
You are absolutely defining an abstract software system in the
processing model.

How could it be otherwise?

Or maybe, as I commented before, we are not talking about the same thing
when we talk about "the processing model"?

Cheers,

E.
-- 
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

W. Eliot Kimber | Lead Brain

1016 La Posada Dr. | Suite 240 | Austin TX  78752
    T 512.656.4139 |  F 512.419.1860 | eliot@isogen.com

w w w . d a t a c h a n n e l . c o m

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
Secure your servers with 128-bit SSL encryption!
Grab your copy of VeriSign's FREE Guide,
"Securing Your Web site for Business." Get it now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KVNB7A/e.WCAA/bT0EAA/2n6YlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/