RE: [ubl-dev] FW: History of Iteminstance

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

On Aug 26, 2013 4:57 PM, "Olimpo Jose Lozada" <olimpo.jose.lozada@oracle.com> wrote:
> We can´t change the definition "a single Item may have multiple ItemInstance" for "a single ItemInstance for each Item". Because our Business Process need generic Item with multiples Specific Item. Is there any solutions different for provide this information required?

Remember when using UBL (or any XML vocabulary) that your exchange syntax document model does not need to be equal to your internal data model structure, it just needs to be mappable to and from your internal data model structure.  So you could map a UBL document that has a repeated "single iteminstance for each item" in the document into a "multiple iteminstance for each item" in your internal data model by grouping on the item at the time you map the syntax to and from your internal data model.

I hope this helps.

. . . . . . . .  Ken