[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-lcsc] Re: [ubl-ndrsc] UN/CEFACT ATG "Generic Header" Pro ject
This thread is a discussion of the question: what, if anything does UBL need to do to align with and support the UN/CEFACT ATG generic header project. -----Original Message----- From: KETELS Kris [mailto:kris.ketels@swift.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 8:43 AM To: Burcham, Bill Cc: 'Eduardo Gutentag'; 'A Gregory'; ubl-lcsc@lists.oasis-open.org; ubl-ndrsc@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [ubl-lcsc] Re: [ubl-ndrsc] UN/CEFACT ATG "Generic Header" Pro ject maybe a stupid question, but what is the relationship (if any) between this discussion and the 'generic header' inititiative going on in the UN/CEFACT ATG2 group? "Burcham, Bill" wrote: > Thanks for the clarification Eduardo. If that's the case then I don't <<munch>>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC