OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl-lcsc message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [ubl-lcsc] Proposal for revised use of Representation Terms for some BBIEs in UBL 1.0 draft 1


Tim
 
You wrote -
 
> however, this will impact on existing
> implementations as it chnages UBL Names.  
> so, if we agree to this we need to make it clear to the ISC.
 
In the absense of an ISC meeting I raised this with
Stephen Parker of Impaq who are implementing UBL
His view was that these sorts of changes (name
changes and smaller other changes) would not
require much work in adapting their implementation.
I too would regard the changes as having low impact
on any development in my own experience.
I therefore will undertake to make the changes
but will keep a separate draft without them as
a fallback in case someone raises greater
misgivings. Thanks Anne though for pointing out
the name change effects. I raised it at FPSC and
we didn't think it likely to cause much disruption
to our work or to Ken's or to the instance samples.
 
Another point
Unless I hear to the contrary I'll take it that I shouldn't
include in the model changes either the inclusion of
more Dispatch Advice details in the Invoice or the
proposed but not agreed Despatch Date (as distinct
from Delivery Date).
 
Any conclusion about CardTpeCode?
 
 
 
All the best
 
Steve
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 2:17 AM
Subject: Re: [ubl-lcsc] Proposal for revised use of Representation Terms for some BBIEs in UBL 1.0 draft 1

i agree with stephen's decisions.

however, this will impact on existing implementations as it chnages UBL Names.  so, if we agree to this we need to make it clear to the ISC.

Stephen Green wrote:
As mentioned on the last conference call, I'd like to
propose some revisions to the usage of Representation
Terms in the existing UBL model (1.0 draft 1)

These are:

 
Recommended:
From To Reason/Notes





LineItemCountQuantity
Quantity Numeric





AllowanceCharge. MultiplierFactorQuantity
Quantity Numeric





CardAccount. Holder
Text Name definition reads “the name of the holder...” and compare to FinancialAccount. Name





PaymentTerms. SettlementDiscountRateNumeric
Numeric Percent definition reads “the ... discount (percentage)”





PaymentTerms. PenaltyDiscountRateNumeric
Numeric Percent As above





TaxCategory. RatePercentNumeric
Numeric Percent definition reads “the tax rate as a percentage”





Maybe:








Item. PackSizeQuantity
Quantity Numeric definition reads “the number of items in a pack”





PhysicalAttribute. DescriptionID
Identifier Code definition reads “... from a formalised list”





CardAccount. CV2
Text Identifier Definition reads “The CV2 identity...”


Thanks

Steve

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]