[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Proposed text for character set/encoding requirements
Mavis Cournane wrote: > Eve > I think I would be lean towards keeping the "(parsers)" in brackets. It makes > it clearer and we have to cater for the lowest common denominator. Okay. > If I am going to normalize our rules I want to understand if we are making just > a recommendation here or are we going to make a rule of it and say "At a > minimum for UBL compliance, all encdoing declarations must be provided in the > XML declarations of UBL documents". I don't know if a MUST would be very testable; I'm happy with using a SHOULD in keeping with the XML Recommendation... Eve -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems NEW!!! cell +1 781 354 9441 Web Technologies and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC