[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Schema edit test
[stephen_green@seventhproject.co.uk:] | Here is a revised version of the sample instances to cater for the | minimal version and the change of schema names / namespaces (both | zip file and zip file with altered extension attached). I don't understand why a change is needed. The instances validate fine against the structure in the build of 16 April. But since I'm changing it back to what it was originally, what's the difference? The build I'm starting on this afternoon will have the instances in ./xml (where they've been all along) and the normative schemas in ./xsd (where they were in the first place). The only difference between this arrangement and the one we had a week ago is that there will also be a new folder (xsdmin or xsdnodoc or whatever) at the same level as ./xsd containing a set of schemas without documentation. This should have zero effect on either the instances or the normative schemas. Am I missing something? If there are other changes here that need to be made independent of the addition of the extra set of schemas, what are they? Jon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]