Re: [virtio] csd01 and csprd01 - v2

[Rusty Russell <rusty@au1.ibm.com>]

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 11:11:08AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 02:18:33PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
>> > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 03:58:54PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > >> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 09:11:53PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> > >> > >> Chet Ensign wrote:
>> > >> > >>    >   -- If possible, in the PDF, align the left margins. That
>> > >> > >>    > is, align
>> > >> > >>    "This
>> > >> > >>    > version:" etc. with "Specification URIs". Not aligned now. 
>> > >> > >>    >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > I could not figure how to fixing this one out yet.  As this is
>> > >> > > cosmetic and does not affect page numbering etc, I think we can
>> > >> > > if necessary fix it after we vote, but pls note it appears like
>> > >> > > this in e.g. CMIS.
>> > >> > 
>> > >> > Hmm, I thought I fixed this, but obviously didn't.  Not sure either...
>> > >> 
>> > >> We approved 01 as is, maybe Pawel will know how to fix it for 02.
>> > >> 
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Heh I got it. This environment is a table so just set the column
>> > > separator to 0 inch.
>> > > The following will do it.
>> > > Not committing until Rusty tells me it's OK.
>> > 
>> > Looks good.  Please apply it for 02.
>> > 
>> > Cheers,
>> > Rusty.
>> 
>> To clarify, I was waiting for you to tag 01 so I can commit to master.
>> I don't see it yet - did you tag?
>
> Oh. We can't tag :(
>
> I see that if we wanted to support tags we had to initially create
> tags and trunk under
> https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/svn/virtio/tags/ and
> https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/svn/virtio/trunk/ as
> opposed to putting everything directly under
> https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/svn/virtio/.
> See
> https://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/svn/xmile/
> for an example.
>
> I guess we can still move stuff but this will affect all checked
> out repos so I'd like to hear from others whether we should do this.
> An alternative is just to record the revisions in some file
> and hope that OASIS will support git natively sooner rather than
> later.
>
> What do others think?

Don't mess with the repo.

My thoughts:

1) Remove the txt version, since it's out of date anyway.
2) Add a REVISION file with "02" in it.
3) Make the scripts use REVISION.

Cheers,
Rusty.