Re: [virtio] Re: towards draft 3 / virtio 1.0

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 01:54:24PM +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 13:24 +0100, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > OK I will try this but I note this gives us back
> > DIFaddbegin/DIFaddend.
> > You are saying with \begingroup/\endgroup color stack
> > overflow errors go away?
> 
> Yes. Commands like \color apply to a single group, usually marked with
> curly brackets {xxx}, with \bgroup and \begingroup (there's some subtle
> difference I don't really understand; enough to say that \bgroup didn't
> work for me ;-). I have no idea why are they pushed to a stack, if there
> seem to be no pop operation, but just enclosing a change in a separate
> group seems enough. That's what my first proposal did (notice extra {}
> in \DIFaddtex), but as you pointed out it missed some bits.
> 
> > How about footnotes?
> > Is there a way to fix them without an external script?
> > Would be nice if the footnote mark was also crossed-out ...
> 
> Right, my first version did it, then I forgot to check it. Anyway, this
> (slightly suboptimal, but I couldn't care less) should cover all cases
> (I see footnotes on page 59 coloured):

The one on page 78 does not seem coloured.

-- 
MST