RE: [ws-rx-editors] RX nits

["Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>]

Doug,

 

I think there is one (I guess minor) correction due:

 

First sentence under the Status section reads: This document was last revised or approved by the WS-RX on the above date.

 

I think we need to add "Technical Committee" after "WS-RX".

 

-- Sanjay

---

From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, Mar 22, 2007 8:47 AM
To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] RX nits

Couple of things I wanted to mention as I was preparing a draft with Marc's proposal:
- I'm updating the dates to be April 5th
- I put Marc's text in a slightly different spot than his proposal - as I think it makes more sense to have it in the Namespace section to explain why 'wsp' isn't in the table.  Is this ok with people? If so, I'll send a note to the RX list with this proposed change.
- Robin, a while ago, noticed that the WSRMP spec doesn't have a space between "Reliable" and "Messaging" in the title - while the RM spec itself does.  Figured I'd add that space.
- The references in the specs refer to the RM specs as "Committee Drafts".  Mary - will it be against OASIS policy to change those to "Committee Specifications" if/when we approve them as CSs?  I know it not part of the 'approved list' of edits after a CS vote.

I've attached the specs to this note so people can review my edits - please look over everything!  :-)


thanks
-Doug
______________________________________________________
STSM  |  Web Services Architect  |  IBM Software Group
(919) 254-6905  |  IBM T/L 444-6905  |  dug@us.ibm.com