Issue 24 - separate schemata for abstract and executable processes

[Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com>]

http://www.choreology.com/external/WS_BPEL_issues_list.html#Issue24

i submitted this issue a while ago, and there hasn't been any discussion.
phil pointed out to me that it's been languishing.  the statement of the
issue is simple:

"Separate schemas for the executable vs. the abstract forms of BPEL would
allow validation by schema, rather than by hand-coded rules based on spec
verbiage. "

consider this a call for discussion.  if there's no discussion in the next 3
weeks, i'll propose a vote on the issue one week before our next meeting.

danny