[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wss] about Hitachi's negative vote
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Nadalin [mailto:drsecure@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 11:21 AM
To: wss@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [wss] about Hitachi's negative vote>Line 599 says that the fragment URL is relative the the URL of the
>document. Where is the URL of the document defined? For example, is it
>on line 9, line 10, or somewhere else?
I don't think that this ambiguous at all as it states what a fragment URL is (we already agreed to the URI of the documents), but it may need an example and I think that is fine to do in an errata.
So my suggestion is that we take Mike's proposal and insert in errata.
Anthony Nadalin | work 512.838.0085 | cell 512.289.4122
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]