Re: [wss] proposal for issue 250: add optional TokenType

[Ron Monzillo <Ronald.Monzillo@Sun.COM>]

NISHIMURA Toshihiro wrote:

>Ron's current proposal shows:
>| /wsse:SecurityTokenReference/@wsse:TokenType
>
>I think we should change this as follows:
>| /wsse:SecurityTokenReference/@wsse11:TokenType
>
>Right?
>---
>Toshi
>
Toshi,

I think this distinction may only be necessary if the
new (perhaps global) attribute is used in a 1.0
context.

Ron

>
>At Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:14:29 -0800,
>DeMartini, Thomas wrote:
>  
>
>>Per our action from the last call, Ron and I discussed offline to see if
>>there was a proposal we could reach consensus on for the next call.  We
>>decided to put two options forward for the TC to consider.
>>
>>Option 1: Close Issue 250 with no action.
>>Option 2: Close Issue 250 according to Ron's email
>>(http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wss/200501/msg00020.html).
>>
>>We think that each member of the TC needs to weigh the advantages of
>>having 1.1 more closely resembling 1.0 (Option 1) against the advantages
>>of having all 1.1 token referencing forms more closely resembling each
>>other (Option 2).  Once each member has determined which set of
>>advantages are most important to them, the TC can have a vote at the Feb
>>8th call to determine which set of advantages are most important to the
>>TC.
>>
>>&Thomas.
>>    
>>
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wss/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>  
>