RE: [xliff] Updated Timeline for progression toward XLIFF 2.0 OASIS Standard - factoring in PR III

[Kevin O'Donnell <kevinod@microsoft.com>]

Hi Bryan,

I don't remember email or phone call discussion regarding PR III. Can you please point out the relevant minutes/thread or summarize why we need another review?

Thanks,
Kevin.

---

From: Schnabel, Bryan S
Sent: ‎10/‎29/‎2013 12:07 PM
To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [xliff] Updated Timeline for progression toward XLIFF 2.0 OASIS Standard - factoring in PR III

Hello,

 

Here’s the new calculation based on our projected need to have a third PR. Note if you want to compare, this is what we calculated when we thought PR II would be enough (https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff/201309/msg00028.html ).

 

1. Reconciled each PR2 comment: [19 Nov]

 

2. Statements of Use [identify by 05 Nov]

 

  A. Must have a statement of use for each core feature

 

  B. Should have a statement of use for each module feature

 

  B. Test Suite (1 application vs. ecosystem of tools)

 

     i. Reference Implementation (one implementation that touches each feature): nice to have; not must have [identify by 05 Nov; roll out by 04 Dec]

 

     ii. Ecosystem of tools [identify list by 05 Nov; roll out by 08 Jan]

 

3. Re-approved Committee Draft (that reflects resolved comments, https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#committeeDraft ) [19 Nov]

 

4. Third Public Review, 15-day [03 Dec - 18 Dec]

 

5. Approve Committee Specification (https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#committeeSpec ) [14 Jan]

 

6. Approve OASIS Standard  (https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#OASISstandard ) [14 Jan - 09 Apr]

 

  A. Submit Candidate Specification [14 Jan]

 

  B. Public Review of Candidate Specification (60 days) [21 Jan - 24 Mar]

 

  C. Ballot for OASIS Specification approval [26 Mar - 09 Apr]