[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of Atlantic UBL TC call 24 April 2013 14:00UTC
MINUTES OF ATLANTIC UBL TC TELECONFERENCE WEDNESDAY 24 APRIL 2013 14:00UTC
ATTENDANCE
Atlantic teleconference:
Oriol Bausa
Kenneth Bengtsson
Kees Duvekot
G. Ken Holman (convener)
Pacific teleconference attendance:
G. Ken Holman (convener)
Tim McGrath
Andy Schoka
Referred to in minutes by first name:
Paul Thorpe
STANDING ITEMS
Additions to the calendar:
http://ubl.xml.org/events
- Australian Standards Stakeholder meeting: Australia's Digital
Economy and the value of eBusiness Standards, Standards
Australia, June 19, 2013 Sydney Australia
http://ubl.xml.org/calendar-event/australias-digital-economy-and-the-value-of-ebusiness-standards-standards-australia
Review of Pacific call minutes (copied below as agenda items)
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201304/msg00041.html
Review of Atlantic call minutes
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201304/msg00034.html
Membership status review
https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#membership
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/membership.php?wg_abbrev=ubl
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/roster.php?num_items=80
- voting status is determined by the following:
- existing voting members must not miss two consecutive meetings to
maintain voting status
- non-voting members must attend two consecutive meetings to obtain
voting status
- no changes in voting membership applicable at the end of this
week's meetings
UBL 2.1 Public Review 3
- latest version of the comment response document has been posted:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201304/msg00035.html
- TC Administration has approved the structuring of the content
- with model approval the final version can now be prepared
- Committee Specification Draft 3 Preview Draft 1 published:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201304/msg00036.html
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201304/msg00037.html
- acceptance of the model changes from PSC:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/201304/msg00043.html
- requests sent to Tim for UML diagrams and Paul for ASN.1 files
UBL 2.1 Release Time-line
Status of the time-line
- comments received during public review 3 are accommodated in the
document model and documentation by Ken H. using TSC and PSC responses
- committee has informally approved the changes to the model and XSD files
- Tim to create UML diagrams from the XSD files
- Paul to create ASN.1 files from the XSD files
- committee specification draft 4 and public review draft 4 ZIPs posted by
Ken H. for vote at either a regular meeting or a special ad-hoc meeting
(if an ad-hoc meeting is called, Ken will propose a date/time around
13:00UTC (09:00EDT and 21:00WST) in order to try and include all voting
members)
- TC Administration notified for posting/processing of public review
(note that TC Administration happens to be very busy with some tasks
being listed for action for almost 2 weeks - just the luck of the draw
with so many committees happening to have action items)
http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=10010&status=1
- TC Administration runs public review 4 for a 15-day period
- comments received during public review 4 are accommodated,
possibly triggering another round of working draft, committee
specification draft and public review draft (but hopefully not)
- if none of the comments are material, then all of the changes
are clearly summarized and reported to OASIS TC Administration
- at a weekly meeting we request OASIS to run a Special Majority Ballot
to approve the committee specification draft as a committee
specification (CS) that can be held seven days after the close
of the public review
https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#committeeSpec
- three statements of use are obtained
- committee submits CS to OASIS as candidate standard
- OASIS runs a 60-day public review
- OASIS conducts a membership-wide ballot
- OASIS approves UBL 2.1 as an OASIS standard
TC CONCALL SCHEDULE
Continuing with the dates and times established late in 2012, adjusted
for daylight savings time:
Pacific call date/time: Wednesdays 00:00UTC
Atlantic call date/time: Wednesdays 14:00UTC
(Note the Pacific call takes place Tuesday evenings west of the
Atlantic Ocean)
Week of 2013-04-29 - regularly scheduled calls
Week of 2013-05-06 - regularly scheduled calls
Week of 2013-05-13 - regularly scheduled calls
Week of 2013-05-20 - no calls (travel week for many members)
Week of 2013-05-27 - no calls (travel week for many members)
Week of 2013-06-03 - regularly scheduled calls
Week of 2013-06-10 - regularly scheduled calls
Proposed informal face-to-face (1 or 2 days)
- re: marketing of UBL 2.1, next steps, etc.
- what are preferred dates in the last two weeks of May?
- propose to meet in or around Copenhagen
- Tim's suggestions: May 17, 20-21, 24 or May 30-31, 2013
- it was noted that no-one on the calls this week (except for Tim)
are able to make a face-to-face during the two-week period because
of travel commitments
2013-09-10/12 - UBL TC Face to Face in Kars, Ontario (Ottawa airport - YOW)
Will anyone be requesting a leave of absence in the near future? For
privacy reasons, this discussion will be kept off of the minutes.
TC calendar:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/calendar.php?wg_abbrev=ubl
TC calendar iCal subscription link:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup_feeds/ical/my_vcalendar.ics?token=fa658a7994a6cefb10c10be09e139af3&workgroup_id=50
OTHER BUSINESS
A question was raised of protocol regarding questions from the public,
based on a posting this past week to the comment list:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-comment/201304/msg00000.html
A reminder to all committee members that the comment list is not for
discussions, only for public submissions and committee responses to
those submissions.
Thanks to Kees for having responded to the guidance question in the
UBL-Dev list with a personal response:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-dev/201304/msg00007.html
The question raised was "this is a personal response, what do we do if
committee members wish to discuss it further, or if we want to prevent
future questions about the same topic since users may not be aware of
the UBL-Dev mail list and only know of the TC mail list and home page?"
All committee members are welcome to bring to the TC committee mail
list any discussion of any nature, especially if they think the topic
is important or general enough requiring an official response. We can
come to a consensus and a conclusion in the TC mail archives and this
can be cited in the UBL-Dev list as a consensus committee opinion with
a simple link into the TC mail list archives.
During this deliberation we can decide if a more formal packaging of
the conclusion is necessary. In such a case, we can produce a committee
note as is happening in regard to Withholding Taxes and the work product
that Roberto, Arianna and Oriol are working on. This also can be cited
in UBL-Dev to end up in those archives for search purposes.
We will then add to our committee home page a list of completed Committee
Note work products for reference by users, listed by topic of interest.
--
Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training |
Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm |
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ |
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com |
Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about |
Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]