Re: [ebxml-bp] Using BPSS/ebMS to implement staged message exchanges

[David RR Webber <david@drrw.info>]

Monica,

OK - I'll volunteer to create a BPSS model and XML for this so we can 
see what might work.

I think that will make it easier to understand if V2 can really handle 
this and how.

Thanks, DW
================================================================

Monica J. Martin wrote:

> David RR Webber wrote:
>
>> Matt,
>>
>> Yes - that works - and then a subsequent signal could override that - 
>> e.g.
>>
>> So in the CPA you'd set earliestTransmissionTime to be "+P2D" - 
>> meaning plus two days from the current date/time.
>>
>> And the incoming signal would include the TransactionID and indicate 
>> "sendImmediately".   The ebMS could then
>> look at the queue for that object, and if it was there initiate sending.
>>
>> Thanks, DW
>> ============================================================
>> Matthew MacKenzie wrote:
>>
>>> How about something like earliestTransmissionTime? 
>>
>>
> mm1: The underlying messaging aside, we have to understand how such a 
> pattern could now be represented (or a pattern extended) to 
> accommodate this business case. BPSS doesn't care that the underlying 
> queuing is delayed. However, it does need to understand if the ticket 
> has business relevance and equates to a commitment. I would recommend 
> this be discussed further by the ebBP team. Matt, we would welcome you 
> joining. Thanks.
>