RE: [office-comment] "draw" ns prefix? (ODF all versions)

["Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>]

Oh my.

1. I notice that "drawing" is specified in section 1.3 tables all the way
back to OASIS ODF 1.0 and that definitions persists in IS 26300 and ODF 1.1
(see also http://wiki.oasis-open.org/oic/SpecAnalysis/1.1/1/1.3).  

2. I also notice that the Relax-NG schema binds the proper namespace URI to
prefix "draw" in section 1.4 (ODF 1.1 and earlier) and that is the prefix
used throughout the schema and throughout the specification as a way to
signify the namespace (see also
http://wiki.oasis-open.org/oic/SpecAnalysis/1.1/1/1.4). 

3. I checked the last-published errata and found no corrections to section
1.3.

 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Brown [mailto:alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk] 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200904/msg00047.html
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 05:33
To: office-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [office-comment] "draw" ns prefix? (ODF all versions)

Dear all,

The "draw" prefix is referenced throughout the spec, but not bound in
the table of Namespace prefixes (1.3).

Is "drawing" perhaps meant?

- Alex.

-- 
This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: office-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: office-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: office-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/
Feedback License: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
Committee: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=office