[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] Using JIRA
Good point about cluttering the list. In that case, if it were up to me, I would respond to the submitter directly and not to the comment list. I am not proposing that be taken on as an ODF TC practice, however. And the periodic FAQ about this is a very good idea. - Dennis PS: I am not concerned with commenters being able to tell their comment was received, but that there is a way to follow the action in how their comment is addressed. -----Original Message----- From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200905/msg00137.html Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 09:55 To: office@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [office] Using JIRA During a public review, we are required to respond to comments. But this is typically done in batch. If we receive 500 comments, we are not expected to send 500 acknowledgements to the comment list. When the public review period is over, we can create a document that indicates the resolution of each comment received and then notify the comment list with a link to that document. My preference is to keep the comment list informative, with as little redundant information as possible. This means that it should predominately consist of: 1) public comments 2) questions on those comments where the comment was unclear 3) clarifications from the original commenter [ ... ]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]