[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.
2008/6/17 Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@sun.com>: > Dave, > > when starting the discussion about item (1)(d) Rob has made the > following suggestion: > >> Let's get the list complete, and then we can have a round of scoring, >> where we each prioritize each deliverable on a scale of 1-10 (10 is >> highest priority). We can use that to inform the overall priorities and >> eventual the projected schedule. > > I think this is a very reasonable approach, and therefore do support > this approach. > > I therefore suggest that we complete the list of possible deliveries and > ensure that each possible deliverable is unambiguously and clearly > defined, (technical) feasible and formally correct before we start to > prioritize them or to request to remove some of the deliverables. If I had had any indication that this was happening I'd support it Michael. AFAIK Sam and I are the only one collating anything. If I saw Rob posting something to Sams website with possible deliverables to be voted on later, I'd be happier. http://sites.google.com/a/odfiic.org/tc/Home/tc-charter/list-of-deliverables I'm not, I'm losing faith in the process to deliver something this group wants. All I'm seeing is circular discussion with no summation. regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk