Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?

[robert_weir@us.ibm.com]

marbux <marbux@gmail.com> wrote on 06/17/2008
09:33:12 AM:


> 
> So I'd counsel against focusing on ODF 1.2 for this TC's work until
> ODF 1.2 is stable and adopted. It's not a stable specification.
> 

And note that the ODF TC has several ways to indicate
stability, by voting Committee Drafts, putting out for public review, voting
it as Committee Specifications, etc.  We don't necessarily need to
wait until ODF 1.2 is approved as an OASIS standard before we look at it.
 Ee probably don't want to invest a lot into test case development
of ODF 1.2 until at least Committee Specification approval.  But even
then I wonder if our effort is best spent giving feedback on the draft
with respect to conformance and interop issues? 

-Rob