Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?

[robert_weir@us.ibm.com]

"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
wrote on 06/20/2008 07:25:51 AM:

> 
> >
> > That's one of the things that scope does, it sets the bounds
of our
> > activities.
> >
> > We also asked to list our deliverables and estimated dates.  That's
where
> > I'd put the ODF 1.1 and ODF 1.2 deliverables, sequenced in that
order.
> >
> > So keep the scope general -- ODF (with no version stated) and
have the
> > deliverables give the detailed sequencing.
> 
> Which wouldn't give the TC a version to do the compliance against.
> Hence No Rob.
> 

I happen to agree with you that the TC should start
with ODF 1.1, but that is a point I will argue with that TC.  I disagree
with your statement that giving an ODF 1.1 document as a formal deliverable,
with a date prior to any ODF 1.2 deliverable, "wouldn't give the TC
a version to do the compliance against".

Although I wish we had agreement on this, unanimity
is not a formal requirement.

-Rob