Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - usecasesLattice.htm uploaded

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

Or perhaps "shared vocabulary", which has a less negative connotation
than controlling or constraining.

Joe

Duane Nickull wrote:
> 
> I apologize for saying this in advance since I usually despise
> wordsmithing requests, however...  is it possible that the term
> "Constrained Vocabulary" can be used rather than "Controlled
> Vocabulary"?  IMO - that makes it easier to grok a Schema Constrained
> instance vs. a MIG constrained representation of an instance (the latter
> for EDI).
> 
> UDEF capable application  vs. UDEF class of application?
> 
> Okay - start the flames
> 
> ;-)
> 
> Duane
> 
> ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote:
> 
> >Carl:
> >
> >Can you elaborate on a couple of the terms that you used in your
> >Lattice use case?
> >
> >I assume that both Taxonomy and Controlled Vocabulary are subtypes
> >of RIM:ClassificationScheme.  But what is a Semantic Object?
> >
> >Also this is the second time someone has mentioned "UDEF Class of
> >application."  Can you say more about what is meant by that phrase?
> >
> >-Evan
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Senior Standards Strategist
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://www.adobe.com