Re: [regrep-semantic] Government Computer News (GCN) Interview -Mentioned Our Work

["David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>]

Joe,

Sounds good!  Contrary to popular belief there are aspects
of the problem space that I'm not trying to solve and
in fact avoiding like the plague, eh?  ; -)

DW

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
To: "David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>
Cc: "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com>; "SCM"
<regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] Government Computer News (GCN)
Interview -Mentioned Our Work


> Excellent - then we can work on including that Namespace Manager
> Function that I proposed to the Registry TC in January 2002[1].
>
> [1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200201/msg00061.html
>
> Joe
> (couldn't resist throwing that in, as namespace identifiers were
> predicatably and conspicuously absent in your response:)
>
> David RR Webber wrote:
> >
> > Joe,
> >
> > Good points.  The SCM noun use case definately handles the
> > details via a TN to support elements/attributes/datatypes
> > storage.
> >
> > I'm planning to have a draft of that fo mid-May timeframe.
> > Right now we have just a strawman XSD - but no documentation
> > to go with it - and of course the use case too.
> >
> > Thanks, DW.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
> > To: "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com>
> > Cc: "David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>; "SCM"
> > <regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:45 AM
> > Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] Government Computer News (GCN)
> > Interview -Mentioned Our Work
> >
> > > Of course, adoption of ebXML Registry is a much easier process than
with
> > > many other types of open standards, as ebXML Registry is the only open
> > > standard that provides the functionality that it provides
> > > (registration/storage/discovery/maintainance of XML and non-XML
> > > artifacts).
> > >
> > > And, as I was reminded at the XML.gov working group meeting yesterday,
> > > lots of US federal folks are waiting for "native" handling of
> > > fine-grained entities such as elements/attributes/datatypes/namespace
> > > identifiers (my "big 4"). I told them that we are moving closer to
this
> > > with our SCM work, which is helping lay the groundwork for these
native
> > > capabilities. What I'm basically trying to say is that US federal
folks
> > > want to be able to pick up an ebXML Registry spec (or TN) and see
these
> > > items called out specifically.
> > >
> > > Joe
> > >
> > > Duane Nickull wrote:
> > > >
> > > > David:
> > > >
> > > > You are right - that is true.  We ahd this discussion in Amsterdam.
> > > >
> > > > I guess a corrected statement is they will formally adopt it in a
"Best
> > > > Practice" document or similar.
> > > >
> > > > Duane
> > > >
> > > > David RR Webber wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Duane,
> > > > >
> > > > >I'm not sure the eGov TC formally adopts anything!
> > > > >
> > > > >I may be mis-speaking here - but the role is more of
> > > > >providing guidelines and best practice details in an
> > > > >advisory capacity.
> > > > >
> > > > >There is no sense of obligation that compells use.
> > > > >
> > > > >That said - it is obviously useful if the eGov TC
> > > > >produces a white paper on Registry and eGov,
> > > > >similar to the one already in progress for ebMS
> > > > >and eGov.
> > > > >
> > > > >Thanks, DW
> > > > >
> > > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > >From: "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com>
> > > > >To: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
> > > > >Cc: "SCM" <regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org>
> > > > >Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 8:57 AM
> > > > >Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] Government Computer News (GCN)
> > Interview -
> > > > >Mentioned Our Work
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>Farrukh also did a great presentation in Amsterdam for registry!!!
It
> > > > >>resonated well with the eGovernment group and I would place heavy
odds
> > > > >>that they formally adopt ebXML Regrep.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Duane
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>Yesterday I had my (twice-postoned) GCN interview on Web Services
> > > > >>>standards. Normally a 30-minute session, the interview lasted 2
> > hours. I
> > > > >>>described our subcommittee's work in detail from the perspective
of
> > Web
> > > > >>>Services.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>Of course, since the printed article will only be one full page,
I
> > > > >>>cannot guarantee that these points will make it into the printed
> > version
> > > > >>>- but I wanted to let everyone know that I emphasized them.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>Joe
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>--
> > > > >>Senior Standards Strategist
> > > > >>Adobe Systems, Inc.
> > > > >>http://www.adobe.com
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Senior Standards Strategist
> > > > Adobe Systems, Inc.
> > > > http://www.adobe.com
> > >
> > > --
> > > Kind Regards,
> > > Joseph Chiusano
> > > Associate
> > > Booz | Allen | Hamilton
> > >
>
> -- 
> Kind Regards,
> Joseph Chiusano
> Associate
> Booz | Allen | Hamilton
>