RE: [regrep] Describing ebXML Reg/Rep - observations from Santa Fe

["Munter, Joel D" <joel.d.munter@intel.com>]

It is still a work in progress so the final TN has yet to be posted.  If
you subscribe to the (public) list, you can review the latest (very good
draft) to get an idea about where the TN is headed.  

Joel Munter, Intel
desk: 480.552.3076
cell:  602.790.0924
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:55 AM
To: Munter, Joel D
Cc: Matthew MacKenzie; Anne Thomas Manes; Max Voskob; Still Erik R;
OASIS regrep
Subject: Re: [regrep] Describing ebXML Reg/Rep - observations from Santa
Fe

Thanks Joel.  The only technical note I see published on the UDDI site
is "Providing a Taxonomy for Use in UDDI Version 2".  Is there a URL
available for the technical note your refer to?

Joe

"Munter, Joel D" wrote:
> 
> Seeing ebXML based services "registered" in a UDDI registry
> (semi-private or the public UBR) and therefore discoverable in a demo
> may go a long way toward eliminating some confusion.
> 
> The Technical note being drafted by Kibakura-san (Fujitsu) and being
> discussed on the UDDI-spec dist list has come along way.  I recommend
> that you all read this and comment as you need to.
> 
> Joel Munter, Intel
> desk: 480.552.3076
> cell:  602.790.0924
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:13 AM
> To: Matthew MacKenzie
> Cc: Anne Thomas Manes; Max Voskob; Still Erik R; OASIS regrep
> Subject: Re: [regrep] Describing ebXML Reg/Rep - observations from
Santa
> Fe
> 
> One way to help remedy this perception might be to present on
> "Registering Web Services in an ebXML Registry" at some of the Web
> services conferences, such as Web Services One.
> 
> Some other things that might help are the Best Practices paper on
> registering Web services in an ebXML Registry (currently in progress),
> and perhaps in the future a high-level mapping between the 2 registry
> architectures (such as "ebXML Registry Classification is *roughly*
> equivalent to UDDI categoryBag", "ebXML Organization is *roughly*
> equivalent to UDDI businessEntity", etc.)
> 
> Joe
> 
> Matthew MacKenzie wrote:
> >
> > Anne,
> >
> > You're right on.  ebXML != Web Services, at least not general
> > perception wise.  I'd like to see that changed somewhat, ebXML
> > messaging is web services based, and ebXML registry is a web
service.
> >
> > On Thursday, Jan 30, 2003, at 07:40 America/Vancouver, Anne Thomas
> > Manes wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I think RegRep's biggest issue is that it's so closely associated
> with
> > > ebXML, and when most people think of Web services, they think of
> SOAP,
> > > not
> > > ebXML. Likewise, when they think of a Web services registry, they
> > > think of
> > > UDDI.