Re: [regrep] Fwd: Re: [emergency] BEA, Microsoft, and TibcoRelease WS-Eventing Specification

[Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>]

Oh, There's no doubt that WSRP will use ebXML Registry, as well as 
UDDI, but it is unlikely that it will adopt any eventing model as its 
own because WSRP needs several kinds of eventing, especially that 
which requires coordination and customization of the data/information 
content contained within event messages for specific kinds of 
processing, and to use event messages as a specific kinds of 
triggering mechanisms. It is also likely that deciding on the 
eventing model per se will not be undertaken until v2.0 after we go 
through v1.1 this year.

Ciao,
Rex

At 10:19 AM -0500 1/13/04, Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>Rex Brooks wrote:
>
>Yup. CAP 1.1 might benefit from integrating the ebXML Registry 
>subscription model, and I will mention it when the appropriate time 
>comes.
>
>That would be good. You can count on help from myself and other TC 
>members when the time is right to help as needed.
>
>>I'm not sure that WSRP TC would be interested, since it is a bit 
>>more specialized, but it's a thought.
>
>Funny you should mention it. There is a lot of interest in WSRP 
>using ebXML Registry. Joe and I are working actively with WSRP to 
>author a Tech Note on using ebXML Registry to publish WSRP Services. 
>A relevant thread is at:
>
>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsrp-pfb/200312/msg00003.html
>
>Thanks.
>
>--
>Regards,
>Farrukh


-- 
Rex Brooks
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth
W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com
Email: rexb@starbourne.com
Tel: 510-849-2309
Fax: By Request