Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question

["Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com>]

> Actually in this case a program should detect a conflict
> and do nothing other then mark this suspect topics
> and present a list of them for a human operator to decide.
> 
> This applies to all merging conflicts.
> (they were discussed at length on this list since last summer)

In short why are you stuck on TNC?

what if topic A has PSIa1 and PSIa2
and topic B has PSIb1 and PSIb2

such that 
PSIa1=PSIb1
and 
PSIa2 != PSIb2

Is this a normal situation?

Other problems are
if A and B have same base names in one scope 
and different names in different scopes.

Should they be merged?
This all should be reported to a human operator as
a conflict situation.
(last case applies to Lars's XTM )

Sorry , have to run...
getting late to my train....

Nikita.

----------------------------------------------------------
Nikita Ogievetsky               Cogitech Inc
XML/XSLT/XLink/TopicMaps   Consultant
nogievet@cogx.com   --   (917) 406-8734
http://www.cogx.com     Cogito Ergo XML







------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://us.click.yahoo.com/kWP7PD/pYNCAA/4ihDAA/2n6YlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/