Re: [xtm-wg] Topic Naming Constraint question

[Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@garshol.priv.no>]

* Nikita Ogievetsky
| 
| In short why are you stuck on TNC?

Because it causes problems.
 
| what if topic A has PSIa1 and PSIa2
| and topic B has PSIb1 and PSIb2
| 
| such that 
| PSIa1=PSIb1
| and 
| PSIa2 != PSIb2
| 
| Is this a normal situation?

Probably. There is at least nothing problematic about it.  The result
will be a topic C that has subject indicators PSI(a|b)1, PSIa2, and
PSIb2. (F.5.2 and F.5.1.)
 
| Other problems are if A and B have same base names in one scope and
| different names in different scopes.
| 
| Should they be merged?

Yes. The result is a topic that has the the union of the base names of
A and B. Annex F is crystal clear on this (F.5.1).

| This all should be reported to a human operator as a conflict
| situation.

Nope.

--Lars M.


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://us.click.yahoo.com/kWP7PD/pYNCAA/4ihDAA/2n6YlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

To Post a message, send it to:   xtm-wg@eGroups.com

To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: xtm-wg-unsubscribe@eGroups.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/