Re: [ws-caf] minutes of the first teleconference

["Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>]

I hope the update was acceptable.

Mark.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pete Wenzel" <pete@seebeyond.com>
To: "Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>
Cc: <ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [ws-caf] minutes of the first teleconference


> Thus spoke Mark Little (mark.little@arjuna.com) on Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at
10:10:42AM -0000:
> > Pete, I think that there was an implied notion of allowing votes in
> > meetings, but unless I missed it (entirely possible in that particular
> > discussion) it wasn't said explicitly. If someone has a more accurate
> > recollection then let me know.
> >
> > One solution would be to replace "route" with "electronic route" in the
> > minutes, to make explicit what was implicit.
>
> That would resolve my concern with the wording.  Thanks!
>
> --Pete
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Pete Wenzel" <pete@seebeyond.com>
> > To: "Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>
> > Cc: <ws-caf@lists.oasis-open.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 7:06 AM
> > Subject: Re: [ws-caf] minutes of the first teleconference
> >
> > > > ...
> > > <1> Jeff (Mischinsky) objected to email ballots and proposals of
motions
> > > > by email. Martin agreed.
> > > >
> > > <2> Eric then asked for clarification of exactly what the new motion
> > > > should be, to which Jeff responded that Kavi should be the only
route
> > > > for voting within the TC.
> > > >
> > > > Pete (Wenzel?) seconded the motion.
> > > >
> > > > Eric asked if there was any further discussion or objections.
Hearing
> > > > none, the motion was carried.
> > >
> > > Seems like something is slightly amiss here, unless my memory is
> > > failing.  I agree with <1> above, but think <2> may not be correct.
> > >
> > > If the restated motion is correct as recorded, we would be unable to
> > > vote during meetings, and every little decision would be delayed for
> > > a week.  My opinion is that at the chairs' discretion, a voice vote
> > > during a meeting may be deemed appropriate for some matters, while
> > > the Kavi route could be chosen for decisions that require further
> > > thought or additional participation.  But definitely the intent was
> > > to disallow email voting.
> > >
> > > --Pete
> > > Pete Wenzel <pete@seebeyond.com>
> > > Senior Architect, SeeBeyond
> > > Standards & Product Strategy
> > > +1-626-471-6311 (US-Pacific)
>