RE: [office] Errata: Proposal for 15.27.22 "-treshold"

["Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>]

Background.  No change to my proposal.

I did some more nosing around, and apparently this is how option (b) - just
fix the schema - was taken:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200606/msg00102.html

"Schema spelling errors
(Michael) should we include mechanisms that allow backwards 
interoperability for the misspelled schema
(James) Process for this in ISO allows editors to just correct this
(Lars) we should do likewise
[no objections]
(Michael) can we proceed likewise for any other schema spelling issues 
that come up?
[no objections]
RESOLUTION: Correction of schema spelling error is part of editorial
process"

This is based on understanding of ISO procedures.  It seems that the current
OASIS rules for errata are different.  And the correction were done only in
1.1 which has not been taken to OASIS Standard as was expected at that time.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamilton@acm.org] 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200809/msg00098.html
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 10:22
To: office@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: 'Patrick Durusau'; 'Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg'
Subject: RE: [office] Errata: Proposal for 15.27.22 "-treshold"

[ ... ]

PS: I don't understand why option (c) was not taken since all of the posts
that responded to Michael's proposal were supportive of doing a deprecation
at 1.1.  It does look like option (b) was actually implemented, in that the
schema was changed for 1.1, but nothing was done about the 1.0 schema and no
deprecation was introduced in 1.1.  I haven't checked committee minutes for
the June 2006 time period to see how explicit this was.

[ ... ]