[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] Errata: Proposal for 15.27.22 "-treshold"
I am completely aligned with the previous direction. Michael, thanks for finding the resolution that was made when ODF 1.1 made the corrections. I propose the following: Step A (for action on 2008-09-29): Option 1: Remove the errata item for 15.27.22 Option 2: Replace the errata item for 15.27.22 with one that corrects the *text* occurrence of "style:wrap-dynamic-threshold" to have -treshold instead. The prose would not change. [This is my favorite because it attracts attention to the situation and acknowledges that the schema rules.] Step B: For later. In time for the next errata or some sort of supplement to ODF 1.1, address the deprecation of all schema misspellings that were expected to be incorporated in ODF 1.1 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200606/msg00075.html This also gives us time to look at additional breaking changes of this kind that have been identified for ODF 1.2. I'd like to see a broader look at up- and down-level compatibility and ways/guidance for to minimize the impact of breaking changes and unknown features. We need to be clear on how to do deprecation, then do the deprecations, and have a clear policy/approach for that now and into the future, picking up on this thread: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200606/msg00087.html - Dennis PS: I don't understand why option (c) was not taken since all of the posts that responded to Michael's proposal were supportive of doing a deprecation at 1.1. It does look like option (b) was actually implemented, in that the schema was changed for 1.1, but nothing was done about the 1.0 schema and no deprecation was introduced in 1.1. I haven't checked committee minutes for the June 2006 time period to see how explicit this was. -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Durusau [mailto:email@example.com] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200809/msg00096.html Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 07:20 To: Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com Subject: Re: [office] Errata: Substantive Schema Change in 15.27.22? Michael, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200809/msg00090.html > Patrick, > <snip> > This is one option. The options we discussed for ODF 1.1 are here: > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200606/msg00075.html > > We actually decided to take option b), that is, to just correct the > errors in the schema. This still may be an option for the ODF 1.0 > errata, too. > > However, since we received the error report for 15.27.22 already and > resolved it already by making a change in ODF 1.1 although we could > have made a change in ODF 1.0 2nd edition, I think it is valid to > refer to that resolution, rather than reverting that resolution. > Ah, ok, that is where I got diverted. Sure, simply refer to the earlier resolution. By "reverting" you mean "re-writing" that resolution. Works for me. Hope you are having a great day! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau firstname.lastname@example.org Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php