Re: [soa-rm] Service Consumer in RM or not?

[Michael Stiefel <development@reliablesoftware.com>]

That is why perhaps using SOA instead of Service Oriented Architecture 
might be a partial solution.

Michael

At 11:44 AM 6/8/2005, John Harby wrote:
>The difficult aspect is that everyone and their brother is now used to
>the SOA buzzword. If we start inventing more do we run the risk of
>confusing the audiences and losing adoption?
>
>On 6/8/05, Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > Since SOA was itself a buzz word invented by an analyst, perhaps we
> > can also coin a new buzzword :)
> > Frank
> >
> > On Jun 7, 2005, at 12:52 PM, Duane Nickull wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> - A Service Orientation Reference Model (SO RM) - that is, don't
> > >> label this as "SOA RM" but rather "SO RM"
> > >> - A SOA Reference Architecture (SOA RA)
> > >>  rather than a single SOA Reference Model (SOA RM).
> > >>
> > >>
> > > Joseph:
> > >
> > > Our intent (as expressed in our charter) has always been to do
> > > this.  The only difference is the change of the name from SOA RM to
> > > SO RM.
> > >
> > > Pro of renaming to SO RM:
> > >
> > > - more accurate reflection of what it really is.
> > >
> > > Con of renaming to SO RM:
> > >
> > > - losing the correlation with SOA.  We are trying to define SOA.
> > > If we change the name, it may be perceived as defining something
> > > different which means we are in the same place as we started when
> > > we finish.
> > > - People may not reconcile the work with SOA which is the primary
> > > goal of the TC
> > >
> > > If there is a desire to explore this further, I would ask that
> > > someone who is a voting member please ask that this be put up for a
> > > web ballot.
> > >
> > > Duane
> > >
> >
> >