RE: [ubl-dev] Tool question

["Crawford, Mark" <mark.crawford@sap.com>]

 

There have been already a big opportunity to avoid such differences, by using UBL 2.0 as the 1st usable set of business documents, and by providing new updates to all UBL adopters, directly from the CEFACT standardization process. 

 

The problem is that UBL is only partially conformant to CCTS and the CCL.  Others are moving towards much greater conformance to the specification - especially version 3 of the specs (CCTS, Data Type Catalogue, NDR, Context Methodology) and direct alignment to the CCL.