[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Updated XACML 2.0 Work Item Index, Version 1.47
Attached. Reflects decisions made at today's TC meeting. -- Anne H. Anderson Email: Anne.Anderson@Sun.COM Sun Microsystems Laboratories 1 Network Drive,UBUR02-311 Tel: 781/442-0928 Burlington, MA 01803-0902 USA Fax: 781/442-1692
Title: XACML 2.0 Work Items Version: 1.47 Updated: 04/04/01 (yy/mm/dd) CURRENT 2.0 DRAFT: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/download.php/6021/oasis-xacml-2.0-core-spec-wd-07.zip THIS WORK ITEM INDEX INCLUDES E-MAILS UP THROUGH: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200404/msg00000.html -------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Open for 2.0. * means needs to be resolved on list or in FG. WI#9. Policies referring to hierarchical resources ACTION [Anne]: develop better proposal *WI#10. Parameters for Combining Algorithms ACTION [TC]: Need to reach consensus on how sequence of <CombinerParameter> is associated with particular <Rule> elements. *WI#18. Obligations in Rules ACTION [TC]: Need to reach consensus: require eval of entire tree, accept non-determinism except where ordered-* versions of combining algs are used, or close work item for 2.0? WI#23. Use XQuery comparison functions for date, time, dateTime ACTION [Seth] WI#29. Policy Authority Delegation ACTION [TC]: Read Use Cases. Discuss at F2F. WI#31. Attribute Issuer as Subject ACTION [TC]: Discuss at F2F. WI#32. Standardize naming to specify rules for requestor's authz policy ACTION [Frank]: Explain use case at F2F. WI#36. Check for requester authorized to ask for authz decision ACTION [TC]: Discuss at F2F. WI#43. Examine interactions between approved work items ACTION [?]: Has to wait for final draft. WI#46. Status detail for missing attributes ACTION [Seth]: define MissingAttribute element. WI#52. New section explaining not backwards compatible and listing changes ACTION [Bill]: Has to wait for final draft. WI#55. Converge SAML and XACML Attribute schema definitions ACTION [TC]: Attend SSTC concall noon EST 8 Apr 2004 to argue for specified, but optional DataType attribute, and possibly for specified, but optional Source attribute. Waiting for SAML 2.0 decisions. WI#58. Standard hierarchy schemas ACTION [Anne]: develop better proposal. WI#62. New string functions ACTION [?]: find standard function definitions. WI#63. Remove "IssueInstant" XML attribute ACTION [Tim]: remove in next draft. *WI#65. Add additional layer of aggregation to XACML attribute naming ACTION [TC]: Need to reach consensus; also waiting for SAML decision. WI#66. Add IP address match functions ACTION [Anne]: provide proposal for functions. *WI#67. Add "IssuerNameFormat" XML attribute to Attribute[Designator] ACTION [TC]: Not yet discussed in TC meetings. *WI#68. Attribute assertion lifetime ACTION [TC]: Not yet discussed in TC meetings. WI#69. AttributeAssignment clarification ACTION [Seth]: summarize consensus reached on list. WI#70. Legal values for string DataType ACTION [Seth]: summarize consensus reached on list. -------------------------------------------------------------------- WI#1. Grid Requirements Any XACML changes needed to satisfy Grid requirements STATUS: Abstract RELATED: #2,3,4,16,17,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37 CHAMPION: Frank Siebenlist WI#2. Location Information Way to pass information needed to configure a PDP and its context and policy handlers/finders in order to evaluate a policy. Examples of such information are: o where to find various Attributes, and what they are keyed off o where Attribute Authorities to be used are located o where to find function, combining algorithm, data-type, Attribute parsing code Such information might be embedded in a. an XACML Request b. an XACML policy c. a third document type TARGET: Location Information Profile TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Open, but not for 2.0; issues; see ACTION. RELATED: #1,24. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00022.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00084.html [TC discussion] CHAMPION: Seth Proctor ACTION [Seth]: need revised proposal. WI#3. Multiple Actions per Request Support Requests containing multiple Actions. Response could either say "All permitted/denied" or could include a separate decision for each. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Closed for 2.0: no proposal submitted by 20 Oct 2003 RELATED: #1. CHAMPION: Frank Siebenlist WI#4. Multiple Resources per Request Support Requests containing multiple Resources. Response could either say "All permitted/denied" or could include a separate decision for each. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Closed for 2.0: no proposal submitted by 20 Oct 2003. RELATED: #1. CHAMPION: Frank Siebenlist WI#5. Privacy Requirements Any XACML changes needed to satisfy Privacy requirements. TARGET: XACML Privacy Profile TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Abstract. RELATED: WI#60 CHAMPION: Tim Moses, Anne Anderson WI#6. Domain-specific identifiers Define a set of domain-specific identifiers based on application usage of XACML. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Closed for 2.0: no proposal submitted by 20 Oct 2003. CHAMPION: Michiharu Kudo WI#7. ConditionReference Allow a Rule to contain a ConditionReference element as an alternative to a Condition element. The ConditionReference would identify a Condition element specified elsewhere. This allows a single Condition to be re-used in Rules under different Targets. An optional ConditionId attribute would be added to the Condition element to support this. TYPE: Simplicity of policy construction. STATUS: Included in XACML 2.0 Draft 0.7. Approved 1 April 2004. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200304/msg00039.html [use cases] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00048.html [Text and schema-Polar] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00062.html [Text and schema-Simon] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00068.html [Tim: keep <Condition>] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00071.html [Simon: agrees] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00074.html [Polar: compromise] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00083.html [Polar agrees with Tim] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00084.html [Polar:type checking] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00101.html [Tim:alt. to Simon] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00107.html [Simon:var close to rule] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00110.html [Expression final] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00113.html [Expression not final] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00114.html [Placement:leave as is] CHAMPION: Michiharu Kudo WI#8. RuleIdReference Define RuleIdReference analogous to PolicyIdReference and PolicySetIdReference. TYPE: Simplicity of policy construction STATUS: Closed for 2.0 20 Oct 2003. Can do this now with a Policy containing a single Rule. RELATED: #19. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200305/msg00004.html CHAMPION: Anne Anderson (on behalf of ebXML) WI#9. Policies referring to hierarchical resources [This is different from WI#42. WI#42 is about how a single request can ask for access to multiple nodes in a hierarchy, getting back multiple responses (which XACML already supports). This item is about how a policy can protect all nodes in a subtree of a hierarchy without having to specify a separate policy condition for each.] How to express policies that apply to a hierarchy of resources. E.g. "Frank can read any file under directory /X/Y". Or "permission to read any file requires permission to execute any directory above the file." TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Open for 2.0. CURRENT proposal below accepted for 2.0 8 Jan 2004, but see newer OPEN ISSUE below. See ACTION. PROPOSALS: OLD: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200304/msg00057.html OLD: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200305/msg00009.html CURRENT: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00078.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200312/msg00050.html [need std hier. schema] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200312/msg00059.html [Anne to Rob Grzywinski] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00070.html [Bob Daly] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00000.html [Bill to Bob] CHAMPION: Simon Godik OPEN ISSUE: how to handle cases like "read" in a file system requiring "execute" permission on all elements higher in the hierarchy. ACTION [Anne]: look at WS-ResourceFramework to see if it addresses hierarchical resources. Otherwise, revise CURRENT. WI#10. Parameters for Combining Algorithms Support an element or attribute in a PolicySet, Policy, or Rule that provides parameters to be used by a Combining Algorithm that is combining the PolicySet, Policy, or Rule. [This was discussed under WI#11 for a while, but was moved back to WI#10 12 Feb 2004 because proposed solution was specific to combining algorithm parameters]. TC meeting on 1 April 2004 approved including combining parameters in the XACML type system; i.e. each <CombinerParameter> will contain an <AttributeValue DataType=".."> element so the PDP can completely evaluate each value before passing it to the combining algorithm. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Open for 2.0. A version is incorporated in XACML 2.0 Draft 0.7, but it makes <CombinerParameters> a child of <Rule> and does not resolve other open issues. Need consensus on proposal. See ISSUE below. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00012.html [Simon] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00016.html [Michiharu/Simon] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00022.html [Polar/Michiharu] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00028.html [Michiharu/Polar] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00032.html [Polar/Michiharu] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00039.html [TC discuss] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00043.html [Michiharu/Polar] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00125.html [Michiharu:summary] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00133.html [Polar:mult.params?] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00137.html [Michiharu to Polar] CHAMPION: Michiharu Kudo APPROVED: a) Schema will be as specified in http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00125.html except that <AttributeValue> will be replaced with <Expression> (per WI#7), which could be a <ConditionReference>. b) <CombinerParameter> <AttributeValue>/<Expression> elements will have a DataType so the PDP can completely evaluate the value before passing it to the CombiningAlgorithm. c) <CombinerParameters> are children of the <Policy>, not of the <Rule>; i.e. they are specified outside the <Rule> elements to which they apply. ISSUE: How are <CombinerParameters> elements and the <CombinerParameter> elements within them associated with particular <Rule> elements? Options: a) Left completely up to the CombiningAlgorithm. [Polar's preference.] b) Specified order: all <CombinerParameter> elements in the 1st <CombinerParameters> element are associated with the 1st <Rule>, the 2nd <CombinerParameters> are associated with the 2nd <Rule>, etc. c) Specified in <CombinerParameters> metadata. E.g. <CombinerParameters ParameterRef="Rule5"> <CombinerParameter ParameterName="p1".../> <CombinerParameter ParameterName="p2".../> </CombinerParameters> <CombinerParameters ParameterRef="Rule2"> <CombinerParameter ParameterName="p1".../> <CombinerParameter ParameterName="p2".../> </CombinerParameters> WI#11. XACML Extension Points Define schema extension points for XACML. See http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00098.html for information that may be relevant on extension points. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Closed for 2.0 on 12 Feb 2004. Any extension points should be for specific functionality, not general extensions that might become "kitchen sink" elements. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00039.html [TC discuss] CHAMPION: Anne Anderson WI#12. Environment Element in Target Allow the Target Element to include an Environment element, just as it now includes Subject, Resource, and Action elements. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Included in 2.0 draft. Accepted for 2.0 on 8 Jan 2004. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200305/msg00012.html CHAMPION: Michiharu Kudo WI#13. Optional Target Elements Make Subjects, Resources, Actions elements optional in a Target. Missing element has same semantics as <Any.../> Make Target itself optional. Missing element has same semantics as a Target containing <AnySubject/>, <AnyResource/>, <AnyAction/>. <Any...> dropped. Environment elements to be treated same as Subject, Resource, Action as far as omitted elements are concerned. No need to add "<Subjects></Subjects> = false" since schema makes an empty <Subjects> element invalid. TYPE: Simplicity of policy construction STATUS: Included in 2.0 draft 05 Section 5.5. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00038.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00062.html [FG accepts] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00064.html [Bill] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00065.html [Daniel] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00066.html [Daniel] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00067.html [Bill] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00068.html [Bill] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00069.html [Daniel] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00039.html [TC discuss] CHAMPION: Hal Lockhart WI#14. Signature envelope requirements Any new XACML work items to meet requirements for signature envelopes around an XACML schema instance, such as including an XACML Policy or Request in a signed SAML Assertion. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Abstract. RELATED: none WI#15. Encrypted XACML schema instance requirements Any new XACML work items to meet requirements for encrypted XACML Policy or Context schema instances. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Abstract. RELATED: none WI#16. XACML Policy in SAML Response Conditions Profile uses of XACML Policy instances as a syntax for specifying Conditions in a SAML Response. TARGET: SAML Profile STATUS: Closed for 2.0: no proposal by 20 Oct 2003. CHAMPION: Frank Siebenlist WI#17. XACML Policy in SAML Request Conditions Profile use of SAML Conditions element as a way for a PEP to pass an XACML Policy to be used by the PDP in evaluating the Request. TARGET: SAML Profile STATUS: Closed for 2.0: no proposal by 20 Oct 2003. CHAMPION: Frank Siebenlist WI#18. Obligations in Rules Allow Rule to contain Obligations. TYPE: Simplicity of policy construction STATUS: Open for 2.0. Issues: requires retrieval and evaluation of all policies and rules in the policy tree, which does not work well in a distributed environment. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200305/msg00011.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00062.html [Polar issues] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00013.html [Michiharu use case] CHAMPION: Michiharu Kudo ACTION [Michiharu; 1 Apr 2004]: willing to accept obligations on rules only under current rules, where result is deterministic only if ordered-* versions of rules . Either agree to require evaluation of entire policy tree or accept non-deterministic obligations or close this issue. Hal: obligations are currently non-deterministic. If want determinism, use ordered-* versions of the combining algorithms. WI#19. Rule as lowest administrative unit Allow a Rule to be the lowest administrative unit for XACML. Probably required to support RuleIdReference. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Closed for 2.0 20 Oct 2003. No proposal. RELATED: #8. CHAMPION: Michiharu Kudo WI#20. Non-normative XACML interpretation guide Rationale, examples, possible implementation models; general information that would help XACML users know the intent of the XACML TC for the use of XACML elements. TARGET: XACML Interpretation Guide STATUS: Open, but not for 2.0. Needs proposal. PROPOSAL: CHAMPION: ? WI#21. Non-normative XACML Primer Primer for XACML usage. TARGET: XACML Primer STATUS: Open, but not for 2.0. Needs proposal. PROPOSAL: CHAMPION: ? WI#22. time-in-range function Provide a function for comparing that a time of day is between two other times of day. TYPE: Erratum fix STATUS: Included in 2.0 draft. Approved in general 30 Oct 2003. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200309/msg00005.html CHAMPION: Seth Proctor WI#23. Use XQuery comparison functions for date, time, dateTime Allow date, time, and dateTime functions to handle comparing a value with no time zone with a value with a time zone. TYPE: Erratum fix STATUS: Open for 2.0. Approved in general 30 Oct 2003. Awaiting new functions. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200307/msg00044.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200312/msg00061.html [Status update] CHAMPION: Seth Proctor ACTION: Seth to provide specification for new comparison functions consistent with XML Schema. WI#24. Define a schema for function declarations Define a schema for declaring the signature of a function. Probably needed with #2 if #2 includes finding parsing and evaluation code for new FunctionIds. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Closed for 2.0: no proposal by 20 Oct 2003. RELATED: #2. CHAMPION: Daniel Engovatov WI#25. Function for comparing file system pathnames. Define a function for specifying and comparing file system pathnames used in resource-id. Possibly new DataType also. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Closed for 2.0: handle per WI#9 proposal. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200309/msg00088.html CHAMPION: Anne Anderson WI#26. Define policy reduction (partial evaluation) of a policy Define a process for reducing a policy based on known information, leaving only the unresolved predicates. The reduced policy is returned along with the context with which the reduction was done. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Closed for 2.0 20 Oct 2003. Use case requirement satisfied using a different model. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00080.html CHAMPION: Frank Siebenlist WI#27. Version number element or attribute in an XACML policy. Some way of indicating the version of a policy having a particular XACML policy id, and a way of placing version constraints on a policy reference. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Included in 2.0 05 draft. Accepted for 2.0 8 Jan 2004. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200312/msg00062.html [Seth] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200312/msg00067.html [Tim] CHAMPION: Seth Proctor WI#28. Define "current time/date/dateTime" during policy evaluation Specify whether time/date/dateTime are constant over a policy evaluation. Proposal is that it be constant. TYPE: Erratum fix STATUS: Included in 2.0 draft. Approved in general 30 Oct 2003. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200308/msg00006.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00035.html #28 CHAMPION: Seth Proctor WI#29. Policy Authority Delegation The ability to express in a policy rule that a certain authorization authority is allowed to administer access control policy for a certain target: i.e. way to say "Frank is trusted to issue policies for resource X". If the PDP trusts the policy rule that states this, then the PDP would also trust policies issued by Frank for resource X. TARGET: Administration Policy Profile STATUS: Open for 2.0, or maybe not. No consensus yet on proposal. Need to review Use Cases Draft below. Topic for F2F. Use Cases Draft approved as TC Working Draft not intended for standardization at 4 March 2004 TC meeting. RELATED: #1,29,31,35,38. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200308/msg00008.html #1 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00035.html #29 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00042.html #29 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00046.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00053.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00054.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00060.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00061.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00062.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00063.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200311/msg00022.html [Frank:Haskell model] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200311/msg00030.html [schema changes] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200311/msg00032.html [Tim:summary] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200311/msg00034.html [Bill:weird case] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200311/msg00036.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200312/msg00009.html [Polar:Abadi calculus] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200312/msg00015.html [Use cases] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200312/msg00019.html [Von Welch,resp] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200312/msg00022.html [Polar to Frank] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200312/msg00025.html [Frank to Polar] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00059.html [FG discuss] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/download.php/5780/oasis_xacml_delegation_use-cases_wd_01.zip [Delegation Use Cases Working Draft] CHAMPION: Frank Siebenlist WI#30. Passing of explicit policy in the Authorization Decision Query This is the same as #17, except that it is more general (i.e. policy from PEP not necessarily passed in SAML Conditions), and also explicitly states that the authority to specify the policy to use has been delegated to the PEP. TYPE: SAML Profile STATUS: Closed for 2.0 21 Oct 2003. Solve by making remote PAP accessible to the local PDP. RELATED: #17, possibly #29,38 PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200308/msg00008.html #2 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00035.html #30 CHAMPION: Frank Siebenlist WI#31. Attribute Issuer as Subject The current attribute issuer type is a string. This restriction doesn't allow one to easily point at an issuer as Subject, and it doesn't allow for any path validation that goes more than one level deep. By allowing an attribute issuer of type subject, one could cater for more complex use-cases that involve policy delegation. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Open for 2.0. No consensus; discuss at F2F. See ACTION. RELATED: #1,29,31,35,38. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200308/msg00008.html #3 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00035.html #31 CHAMPION: Frank Siebenlist ACTION [All; 12 Feb 2004]: Depends on Admin Policy model. Request use cases from those interested in this item. Plan to agree on a model at the next F2F. This will require people to do homework ahead of time. Align with SAML: touched on in Tim's delegation use case document. WI#32. Standardize naming to specify rules for requestor's authz policy In a setting where a requester invokes certain operations of a service provider, the convention for the target of the service provider's policy is well defined: subject=requester, resource=service-provider, and action=operation. However, when we consider the policy evaluation on the requester's side to check whether an invocation on the service provider is allowed according to the requester's policy, then is it less clear. It is almost a mirror case, but if we take a convention where the "resource" is the one protected by the policy, the we should equate subject=service-provider and resource=requester with the same action=operation. Unfortunately, if we also have to consider the possibility that the service-provider can invoke an equivalent operation on the requester, then we need an additional way to discriminate between these cases. Maybe we can label the action with a category of "out-bound" (?). TARGET: Separate profile? TYPE: New functionality. STATUS: Open for 2.0. No consensus. See ACTION. RELATED: #1,29,31,35,38. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200308/msg00008.html #4 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00035.html #32 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00042.html #32 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00059.html [FG discuss] CHAMPION: Frank Siebenlist ACTION [Frank; 12 Feb 2004]: explain use case in a teleconference, not just in an e-mail. WI#33. XACML wsdl/porttype definition for <Req>/<Resp> exchange Abstract the decision request and response messages between the context handler and the PDP into a wsdl/porttype definition. TARGET: WSDL Profile STATUS: Open, but not for 2.0. Needs detailed proposal. RELATED: #1. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200308/msg00008.html #5 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00035.html #33 CHAMPION: Frank Siebenlist WI#34. porttype/operations to ask for required attributes Allow a requester to query the resource's authorization policy for the required attributes for a Target such that it "knows" which one are missing and would have to be retrieved and presented with any request. TARGET: WSDL Profile STATUS: Open, but not for 2.0. Open issues. RELATED: #1. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200308/msg00008.html #6 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00035.html #34 CHAMPION: Frank Siebenlist WI#35. Policy on revealing missing attributes The returning of the missing attribute info is sensitive information and should itself be subject to policy. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Closed for 2.0 21 Oct 2003. Can be solved using existing XACML policies. RELATED: #1,29,31,35,38. PROPOSAL: OLD: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200308/msg00008.html #7 CURRENT: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00081.html CHAMPION: Frank Siebenlist WI#36. Check for requester authorized to ask for authz decision Proposes that the PDP have a formally defined access control mechanism to "downstream PDPs". The PDP should check whether the upstream PDP requester, i.e. subject associated with the context handler, is allowed to ask for the authorization decision. We need to be able to state this in a policy statement, and describe the correct operating procedure. TARGET: Administrative Policy Profile? TYPE: New functionality. STATUS: Open for 2.0. Open issues for F2F. See ACTION. RELATED: #1,29,30,31,35,38. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00035.html #36 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00074.html #36 on 20 Oct 2003 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00059.html [FG discuss] CHAMPION: Frank Siebenlist ACTION [All; 12 Feb 2004]: This should be an aspect of our Administrative Policy, and should be resolved at the next F2F as part of the overall Administrative Policy framework. WI#37. Multiple <AttributeValue> elements for single <Attribute> in Request Allow <Attribute DataType="Y" ID=X> <AttributeValue DataType="Y">A</AttributeValue> <AttributeValue DataType="Y">B</AttributeValue> <AttributeValue DataType="Y">C</AttributeValue> </Attribute> as syntactic shorthand for <Attribute DataType="Y" ID=X> <AttributeValue DataType="Y">A</AttributeValue> </Attribute> <Attribute DataType="Y" ID=X> <AttributeValue DataType="Y">B</AttributeValue> </Attribute> <Attribute DataType="Y" ID=X> <AttributeValue DataType="Y">C</AttributeValue> </Attribute> This makes it easier to convert SAML Attributes into XACML Attributes, and is consistent with the way XPath treats the same set of AttributeValues. TYPE: Simplicity of Request construction STATUS: Included in 2.0 draft 0.7. RELATED: #55 PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00037.html #37 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00019.html [Rebekah - Q's] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00029.html [Rebekah] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00096.html [FG discussion] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00001.html [Tim's clarificatin] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00002.html [Seth to Tim] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00015.html [response to Rebekah Q's] CHAMPION: Rebekah Lepro WI#38. Policies for the Administration of XACML Policies XACML defines a language to express policies about access to resources. But it is also desirable to create policies about the creation, modification and deletion of XACML policies. In a sense XACML already allows this, since XACML policies are agnostic to the semantics of the resources being protected. However, it is very desirable for administrative policies to specify not the "name" of policies being administered, but their "content." TYPE: New functionality. TARGET: Administration Policy Profile STATUS: Closed as duplicate of #19 on 12 Feb 2004. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200308/msg00050.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00037.html #38 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00054.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00059.html [FG discuss] CHAMPION: Hal Lockhart WI#39. Make Status in the XACML Response optional Makes it possible to allow Status for Indeterminate situations to be conveyed in the protocol envelope (such as SAML DecisionStatement) rather than in the XACML Response for cases where that is more appropriate. Avoids having redundant and possibly inconsistent Status fields when XACML Response is carried in some envelope that also has a Status. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Included in 2.0 draft. Accepted in general for 2.0 30 Oct 2003. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00037.html #39 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00040.html CHAMPION: Hal Lockhart WI#40. Define a SAML PolicyQuery and PolicyStatement Define syntax for SAML that will allow a Query for one or more Policy or PolicySet instances with specified Policy[Set]Ids or with copy of a Request Context that need to be matched, and will return the requested instances in a PolicyStatement in a SAML Assertion. TYPE: XACML SAML Profile STATUS: Open, but not for 2.0. RELATED: #48. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00031.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00032.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00034.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00036.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00037.html #40 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00077.html [SAML F2F status] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00095.html [SAML Profile draft] CHAMPION: Hal Lockhart WI#41. General attribute classifications instead of Subject, Resource, ... Instead of using the fixed attribute classifications "Subject", "Resource", "Action", and "Environment", allow arbitrary attribute classifications to be used, each identified by a URN and associated with a profile that explains its use and semantics. TYPE: New functionality. STATUS: Closed for 2.0 8 Jan 2004, although could be considered for future version if proposal submitted. RELATED: #2,24. CHAMPION: Daniel Engovatov WI#42. Requests asking for access to multiple elements in a hierarchical resource [This is different from WI#9. This item is about how a single request can ask for access to multiple nodes in a hierarchy, getting back multiple responses (which XACML already supports). XACML also already supports this when resource is an XML document using the "scope" = "Immediate", "Children", "Descendents" attribute. WI#9 is about how a policy can protect all nodes in a subtree of a hierarchy without having to specify a separate policy condition for each node.] How to express requests that ask for access to multiple elements in a hierarchical resource, i.e. "Does Frank have access to all elements under /X/Y?". XACML currently defines a standard Resource AttributeId "urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:resource:scope" that can be used to express whether a request applies to "Immediate", "Children", or "Descendents". XACML also currently defines a way to include an XML document in a <ResourceContent> element as part of a Request. This is sufficient if all hierarchies are assumed to be XML documents and if the document itself is always included in <ResourceContent> when multiple decisions are requested. What is missing is a way of handling hierarchical resources that are not XML documents, such as file system directories. To handle other types of hierarchies, it will be necessary to identify what type of hierarchy the resource is and, in a related profile, what syntax is to be used in expressing and referring to nodes and elements in hierarchies of that type. Proposal 200310/msg00078.html proposes to solve this by requiring all hierarchical resources to be represented and referenced as XML instances using XPath expressions. If this is accepted, then the specification needs to state this explicitly. TYPE: New functionality. STATUS: Accepted in general for 2.0 30 Oct 2003. Resolution is: supply resource hierarchy in XML representation in <ResourceContent>. Development of a standard XML representation for general or specific hierarchical resources is a separate WI#58. Need owner for ACTION below. RELATED: #9,25,42,58. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00078.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00082.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00047.html [Simon add'l issues] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00048.html [Michiharu to Simon] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00059.html [FG discuss] CHAMPION: Simon Godik ACTION [?]: Needs to be explained in specification in non-normative Hierarchical Resources section. WI#43. Examine interactions between approved work items As part of the editorial process, a check is needed to ensure that there are no unexpected problematic interactions between approved work items. TYPE: Editorial STATUS: Open for 2.0. Waiting for resolutions to all other open WI's. CHAMPION: ? WI#44. Fix examples in the XACML Specification Review & correct all examples before the 2.0 release. TYPE: Editorial STATUS: Abstract. RELATED: #45. WI#45. Fix AttributeAssignment example in Section 4.2.4.3 (Rule 3) In this example, AttributeAssignments contain AttributeSelectors and AttributeDesignators. While this isn't illegal, the example implies something about the specification that isn't true (ie, that the PDP will interpret the contents of assignments). TYPE: Editorial STATUS: Included in 2.0 draft. Accepted 12 Feb. Related #44. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00064.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00067.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00068.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00069.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200311/msg00009.html CHAMPION: Michiharu Kudo WI#46. Status detail for missing attributes In 6.15 there is an explanation for what detail to include with the missing-attribute status code: Attributes specify one or more missing values, and if an AttributeValue is included, then this specifies an acceptable value. If no AttributeValue is included, then the PDP is specifying the identifier and datatype only. Sounds good. The problem is that the Attribute type is <xs:element ref="xacml-context:AttributeValue"/> This means that it's not valid to have an Attribute with no AttributeValue. So, it's not possible for the PDP to specify a missing attribute without specifying at least one acceptable value (note that even an empty AttributeValue tag, which is still legal, is still technically a value). PDPs need a way to specify missing attributes without providing acceptable values. Need to define a new "missing attribute" schema element that can return attribute meta-data (with or without Attribute Value information) for this. TYPE: Erratum STATUS: Open for 2.0. Accepted in general 30 Oct 2003. See ACTION. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00076.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200310/msg00077.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00104.html [Seth:no change OK] CHAMPION: Seth Proctor ACTION [Seth; 18 Mar 2004]: define new "MissingAttribute" element that is exactly like existing Attribute, except that AttributeValue is optional. WI#47. New SAML Authorization Decision Query/Response using XACML TARGET: XACML SAML Profile STATUS: Open, but not for 2.0. SAML accepts XACML/OGSA proposal in general, but says XACML should define a SAML extension using the XACMLnamespace. We need to verify that SAML 2.0 changes do not invalidate our proposal. Only Sun(?), Oblix, and Entrust seem to use the SAML 1.0 version, so will be deprecated in SAML 2.0. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00077.html [SAML F2F status] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00095.html [SAML Profile draft] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00099.html [Polar] CHAMPION: Anne Anderson and Hal Lockhart WI#48. PAP Interface to a PDP/PRP Define an interface to a PDP or PRP (Policy Repository Point) from a PAP for pushing and/or managing policies. TARGET: XACML Interface Definitions Specification STATUS: Open, but not for 2.0. Requirements spec needed. RELATED: #38,40. PROPOSAL: CHAMPION: Tim Moses (expects to get to this soon 26 Feb 2004). WI#49. Improve example showing how obligations work The example in Section 4.2.4.3 is somewhat misleading and has caused confusion among XACML users. See PROPOSAL for specific points. TYPE: Erratum STATUS: Closed. Same as #45. CHAMPION: Michiharu Kudo WI#50. Fix obligations erratum: fulfilled by PDP Lines 2077-2078 in the 1.1 specification say "The <Obligations> element SHALL contain a set of obligations that MUST be fulfilled by the PDP in conjunction with the authorization decision." "PDP" should be "PEP". TYPE: Erratum STATUS: Included in 2.0 draft. Accepted for 2.0 8 Jan 2004. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200311/msg00060.html CHAMPION: Anne Anderson WI#51. Clarify obligations: "fulfill" vs. "understand" Lines:1768-1770,2731-2733,2756-2757,2859-2862,3060-3062 Intermixed uses of "fulfill" and "understand" with respect to obligations semantics is confusing. For example, "what is the recommended action for an obligation that is understood yet is unable to be fulfilled?" TYPE: Erratum STATUS: Included in 2.0 draft 05. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200311/msg00059.html CHAMPION: Michiharu Kudo WI#52. New section explaining not backwards compatible and listing changes The XACML 2.0 specification should have a new section that explains 2.0 is not backwards compatible with 1.0 or 1.1, and listing the changes made between 1.0 (and/or 1.1) and 2.0. TYPE: Editorial STATUS: Open for 2.0. Awaiting resolution of other WI's. PROPOSAL: CHAMPION: Bill Parducci ACTION [Bill]: submit draft text to Tim by 17 April so can take into account changes in other proposals. WI#53. Drop <Function> element I believe its purpose can be served by the <Apply> element when the FunctionId attribute identifies one of the bag functions. We already allow a similar special case in the <Condition> element, which is an <Apply> element whose FunctionId attribute must identify a function whose return type is boolean. As currently structured, the bag function does not "enclose" the attributes or functions to which it applies. If we require the use of the <Apply> element instead, the bag function can enclose the attributes or functions to which it applies. See lines [a477] to [a491] in draft 3. TYPE: Simplicity of policy construction. STATUS: Included in XACML 2.0 Draft 7 Section 5.33. No plans currently to change or eliminate <Function>. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200312/msg00063.html [Tim] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200312/msg00064.html [Daniel] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200312/msg00065.html [Polar to Tim] CHAMPION: Tim Moses WI#54. Is resource-id required? First issue: V1.1 Section 6.3 schema fragment says resource must have 0 or more attributes, but text that follows says there must be one and only one instance of the "resource-id" attribute (implying one or more attributes, exactly one of which must be "resource-id"). These two should be made consistent. [Tim] Second issue: Why do we require "resource-id"? Some policies may depend only on the security label of the resource, only on the host machine where the resource is located, or some other attribute of the resource, but may not care about the actual "resource-id" at all. [Anne] TYPE: Simplicity of policy construction and erratum fix STATUS: Included in 2.0 Draft ?. Voted to make resource-id optional 8 Jan 2004. See ACTION. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00000.html [Tim] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00001.html [Anne] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00002.html [Seth to Anne] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00003.html [Bill to Tim] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00004.html [Anne] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00005.html [Daniel to Anne] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00006.html [Satoshi to Anne] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00007.html [Daniel to Satoshi] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00008.html [Satoshi to Daniel] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00009.html [Daniel to Satoshi] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00010.html [Satoshi to Daniel] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00011.html [Daniel to Satoshi] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00012.html [Satoshi] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00013.html [Daniel to Satoshi] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00014.html [Satoshi to Daniel] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00015.html [Daniel to Satoshi] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00016.html [Satoshi to Seth] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00017.html [Tim] CHAMPION: Tim Moses and Anne Anderson ACTION [Tim]: make optional in next draft. WI#55. Converge SAML and XACML Attribute schema definitions Need algorithmic mapping between SAML Attribute and XACML Attribute. Some issues are keeping Issuer syntax compatible and handling two-part SAML Attribute names (domain plus id) and one-part XACML Attribute. Might be able to handle some of this using AttributeSelector, and inserting SAML Attribute Assertion as AttributeValue with DataType of saml:Assertion or saml:Attribute. TYPE: Interoperability. TARGET: Some of this could go into an XACML SAML Profile, but not all. STATUS: Open for 2.0. Still under discussion. SAML has not frozen their 2.0 Attribute definition. Should not hold up XACML 2.0 for SAML 2.0 [FG 11 Mar 2004] RELATED: #37 PROPOSAL: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security/download.php/4884/draft-sstc-attribute-02.pdf [Rebekah SAML proposal] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00031.html [Anne - draft answer to SAML] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00032.html [Anne] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00034.html [Scott Cantor] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00039.html [SAML/XACML mtg] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00077.html [SAML F2F status] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/download.php/5854/wd-xacml-saml-profile-02.pdfy [SAML Profile draft] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00065.html [XACML options] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00112.html [Status, options] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00139.html [SSTC:drop ValueType] CHAMPION: Rebekah Lepro WI#56. Should Request Context be optional (non-normative) Use of the Request Context should be non-normative, so long as policy evaluation is consistent with the behavior given a Request Context. TYPE: Erratum fix STATUS: Included in 2.0 Draft 06. Accepted for 2.0 8 Jan 2004. Detailed text below accepted 22 Jan 2004. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00037.html [detailed text] CHAMPION: Hal Lockhart WI#57. Make Environment element optional in Request Context TYPE: Simplicity of Request construction. STATUS: Closed for 2.0 8 Jan 2004. Leave as is: minOccurs="1". WI#58. Standard hierarchy schemas Given resolution to hierarchical resources in WI#9, there needs to be a standard schema for certain common hierarchies such as UFS. TYPE: Interoperability. TARGET: Could be separate profile, but if a single standard schema for hierarchies developed, it should be part of 2.0. STATUS: Open for 2.0 or maybe not. See ACTION below. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00059.html [Anne] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00060.html [Rebekah to Anne] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00061.html [Anne to Rebekah] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00063.html [Frank] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00018.html [Anne] CHAMPION: Anne Anderson (for UFS and WFS, at least) ACTION [Anne]: need to be able to associate attributes such as owner with nodes. Look at W3C ResourceDescriptionFramework, in case it offers anything. We don't know if this applies, but the name sounds promising. WI#59. Define standard "role" subject attribute Add following to Appendix B.5 "Subject attributes": This identifier indicates a role associated with the subject. Values of this attribute SHOULD be of type "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI". urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:subject:role TARGET: XACML Profile for Role Based Access Control. STATUS: Open, but not for 2.0. 12 Feb 2004 FG recommended including in next RBAC draft. Need vote to approve RBAC Version 02 as Committee Draft with this. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200401/msg00038.html CHAMPION: Anne Anderson WI#60. Define standard "purpose" attributes In order to deal with certain regulatory requirements, it would be useful to have a standard "purpose" attribute for resource and for action. urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:resource:purpose urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:2.0:action:purpose We could also define a standard rule that requires the resource purpose to include the action purpose. This would enforce the requirement that data resources only be used for the purposes for which they were collected. TYPE: Privacy Profile STATUS: Open, but not for 2.0. 4 March 2004 approved Tim's proposal as a TC Working Draft. PROPOSAL: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/download.php/5781/oasis_xacml_v2_0_privacy-profile_wd_01.zip CHAMPION: Tim Moses ACTION [Tony; 4 March 2004]: look at W3C work in the privacy area and provide XACML TC with a summary. WI#61. Negating TargetMatch For Target Matching, ability to say things like "match any subject who doesn't have this name" or "match any access not for this server." Having a flag (or something) that negates a TargetMatch. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Closed for 2.0 on 18 Mar 2004. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00090.html CHAMPION: Seth Proctor (on behalf of an XACML users) WI#62. New string functions Some of the standard string functions like concatenation, substring, etc. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Open for 2.0. 18 March 2004: OK if specific proposals. See ACTION. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200402/msg00090.html CHAMPION: Seth Proctor ACTION [?; 18 March 2004]: find definitions of such functions from some other standard. Provide use cases for each. WI#63. Remove "IssueInstant" XML attribute TYPE: Remove unusable, vestigial attribute STATUS: Included in 2.0 Draft ?. Approved removal 18 Mar 2004 See ACTION. PROPOSAL: CHAMPION: ACTION [Tim; 18 Mar 2004]: remove in next draft. WI#64. Align XACML Attribute with SAML Attribute After SAML settles their Attribute format for 2.0, define mapping. TYPE: Interoperability STATUS: Closed 31 March 2004 as duplicate of WI#55. WI#65. Add additional layer of aggregation to XACML attribute naming TYPE: Interoperability STATUS: Open for 2.0. To be discussed in TC; also waiting for SAML decision. PROPOSAL: CHAMPION: Daniel WI#66. Add IP address match functions XACML defines a SubjectCategory for "requesting-machine" and users mention use of IP addresses as attributes, but XACML provides no functions for comparing two IP addresses. Comparisons should include address and optional port or port range, and should include DNS names as well as numeric IP addresses. Comparisons should handle 64-bit names as well as 32-bit names. One use case is to provide functionality of the Java SocketPermission. TYPE: New functionality. STATUS: Open for 2.0. Waiting specific proposal with functions. PROPOSAL: CHAMPION: Anne Anderson WI#67. Add "IssuerNameFormat" XML attribute to Attribute[Designator] TYPE: Interoperability with SAML STATUS: Not yet discussed in TC meetings. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00055.html [Anne-proposal] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00056.html [Seth to Anne] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00058.html [Anne to Seth] CHAMPION: Anne WI#68. Attribute assertion lifetime Need some way to indicate validity period for attributes included in a Request, and way to place constraints on acceptable validity in Policy. Alternative view says testing for validity is done by Context Handler, not by policy. All attributes included in a Request Context are assumed to be valid at the time the PDP is asked to use the Request Context in making an authorization decision. TYPE: New functionality STATUS: Not discussed in TC meetings. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00067.html [Daniel to Frank] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00072.html [Polar: formal approach] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00073.html [Anne: use WSPL] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00078.html [Daniel:new datatype] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00079.html [Frank to Anne] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00082.html [Daniel:caching] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00086.html [Polar to Frank] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00088.html [Polar agrees with Daniel] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00089.html [Frank to Polar] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00092.html [Frank to Daniel] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00093.html [Daniel to Frank] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00095.html [Polar to Frank] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00096.html [Frank gives up] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00097.html [Anne to Frank] CHAMPION: Frank Siebenlist WI#69. AttributeAssignment clarification TYPE: Clarification STATUS: Not discussed in TC meetings. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00116.html CHAMPION: Seth Proctor ACTION [Seth; 1 Apr 04]: will summarize consensus. WI#70. Legal values for string DataType is it legal in XACML to use string as the datatype for what may be interpreted as complex content? I would suggest the answer is no, unless we want to add explicit text to the XACML specification explaining why it's ok. Keep in mind that for people using DOM/SAX, the tree will be interpreted before they see the value, and this can cause the tags to change their representation (eg, namespacing, macro replacing, etc). TYPE: Clarification STATUS: Not discussed in TC meetings. PROPOSAL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00117.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00118.html [Rich Salz:agrees] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00119.html [Daniel:example invalid] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00122.html [Seth<->Daniel] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00123.html [Satoshi:change tests] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00130.html [Daniel:quote XML] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00131.html [Tim:alternative] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00134.html [Daniel<->Tim] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/200403/msg00135.html [Seth:no to alt] CHAMPION: Seth Proctor ACTION [Seth; 1 Apr 04]: will summarize consensus.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]