search-ws-comment

• RE: [search-ws-comment] "Last Week" is a bad idea for <actualValue>
  From "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org> on 27 Oct 2010 17:37:12 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] "Last Week" is a bad idea for <actualValue>
  From "Edward C. Zimmermann" <edz@nonmonotonic.net> on 27 Oct 2010 06:57:14 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] "Last Week" is a bad idea for <actualValue>
  From "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov> on 26 Oct 2010 13:51:13 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] "Last Week" is a bad idea for <actualValue>
  From "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov> on 26 Oct 2010 13:51:12 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] "Last Week" is a bad idea for <actualValue>
  From "Edo Plantinga" <Edo.Plantinga@ictu.nl> on 26 Oct 2010 08:47:49 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] "Last Week" is a bad idea for <actualValue>
  From "Edward C. Zimmermann" <edz@nonmonotonic.net> on 26 Oct 2010 08:06:52 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] "Last Week" is a bad idea for <actualValue>
  From "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org> on 26 Oct 2010 01:05:43 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] "Last Week" is a bad idea for <actualValue>
  From "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov> on 25 Oct 2010 22:43:45 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] "Last Week" is a bad idea for <actualValue>
  From "Edward C. Zimmermann" <edz@nonmonotonic.net> on 25 Oct 2010 15:19:23 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] "Last Week" is a bad idea for <actualValue>
  From "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org> on 25 Oct 2010 14:28:37 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] "Last Week" is a bad idea for <actualValue>
  From "Edo Plantinga" <Edo.Plantinga@ictu.nl> on 25 Oct 2010 14:16:58 -0000
• "Last Week" is a bad idea for <actualValue>
  From "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org> on 25 Oct 2010 14:01:49 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment]DisplayTerm // Forms versus Scan and Facet // was: ....
  From "Edward C. Zimmermann" <edz@nonmonotonic.net> on 21 Oct 2010 19:11:25 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment]DisplayTerm // Forms versus Scan and Facet // was: ....
  From "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org> on 21 Oct 2010 17:35:36 -0000
• <displayTerm> as a subelement of <term> in Scan responses
  From "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org> on 21 Oct 2010 17:25:09 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment]DisplayTerm // Forms versus Scan and Facet // was: ....
  From "Edward C. Zimmermann" <edz@nonmonotonic.net> on 21 Oct 2010 16:12:04 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment]DisplayTerm // Forms versus Scan and Facet // was: ....
  From "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org> on 21 Oct 2010 15:26:05 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment]DisplayTerm // Forms versus Scan and Facet // was: ....
  From "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org> on 21 Oct 2010 15:22:29 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment]DisplayTerm // Forms versus Scan and Facet // was: ....
  From "Edo Plantinga" <Edo.Plantinga@ictu.nl> on 21 Oct 2010 13:43:17 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment]DisplayTerm // Forms versus Scan and Facet // was: ....
  From "Edward C. Zimmermann" <edz@nonmonotonic.net> on 21 Oct 2010 12:40:55 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment]Forms versus Scan and Facet // was: ....
  From "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org> on 20 Oct 2010 15:55:50 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment]Forms versus Scan and Facet // was: ....
  From "Edo Plantinga" <Edo.Plantinga@ictu.nl> on 20 Oct 2010 15:32:17 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment]Forms versus Scan and Facet // was: ....
  From "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org> on 20 Oct 2010 15:06:14 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] DisplayTerm RE: Proposal to remove facet range feature from SRU 2.0
  From "Edward C. Zimmermann" <edz@nonmonotonic.net> on 20 Oct 2010 11:38:20 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] RE: Proposal to remove facet range feature from SRU 2.0
  From "Edo Plantinga" <Edo.Plantinga@ictu.nl> on 20 Oct 2010 07:45:34 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] RE: Proposal to remove facet range feature from SRU 2.0
  From "Edward C. Zimmermann" <edz@nonmonotonic.net> on 19 Oct 2010 19:42:47 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] RE: Proposal to remove facet range feature from SRU 2.0
  From "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org> on 19 Oct 2010 18:42:16 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] RE: Proposal to remove facet range feature from SRU 2.0
  From "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov> on 19 Oct 2010 18:30:11 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] RE: Proposal to remove facet range feature from SRU 2.0
  From "Edo Plantinga" <Edo.Plantinga@ictu.nl> on 9 Oct 2010 11:14:34 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] RE: Proposal to remove facet range feature from SRU 2.0
  From "LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org> on 8 Oct 2010 15:42:09 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] RE: Proposal to remove facet range feature from SRU 2.0
  From "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov> on 8 Oct 2010 14:38:43 -0000
• RE: [search-ws-comment] RE: Proposal to remove facet range feature from SRU 2.0
  From "Edo Plantinga" <Edo.Plantinga@ictu.nl> on 5 Oct 2010 12:05:26 -0000